Loading…

Required Active Earth Pressure for 3D ERSs Following a Modified Mohr-Coulomb Strength Criterion

Exploiting the linear Mohr-Coulomb strength criterion, the stability computation for earth retaining structures (ERSs) by estimating the active earth pressure has been mainly conducted by setting the plane strain 2D. In this research, the modified MC strength criterion with reduced tensile strength...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:KSCE journal of civil engineering 2024, 28(7), , pp.2639-2646
Main Authors: Xu, Jingshu, Wang, Xinrui, Li, Liyun, Du, Xiuli
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Exploiting the linear Mohr-Coulomb strength criterion, the stability computation for earth retaining structures (ERSs) by estimating the active earth pressure has been mainly conducted by setting the plane strain 2D. In this research, the modified MC strength criterion with reduced tensile strength is put into use for the stability analysis of ERSs employing a 3D multi-cone collapse analysis mechanism. After computing the coefficient of active earth pressure, the optimal results are captured from a combination of the genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization. Research findings are validated through comparison, while the influences of soil tensile strength threshold and 3D geometrical features over the stability measures and critical failure modes of ERSs are explored by parametric assessment. It is revealed in this work that the linear MC strength criterion derives conservative estimates of the active earth pressure. The tensile strength threshold of soil has a pronounced effect on both the objective solutions and failure shapes, especially for the ERSs under a greater dimensionless cohesion c/γH . This work provides a straightforward approach to perform a 3D stability analysis of ERSs considering a tensile strength cutoff, without a pre-assumed distribution of the rupture angle.
ISSN:1226-7988
1976-3808
DOI:10.1007/s12205-024-0356-5