Loading…

Impact of adjuvant hysterectomy on prognosis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis

Few data exist regarding adjuvant hysterectomy (AH) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. We investigated the effect of AH on prognosis in LACC patients, through meta-analysis. EMBASE and MEDLINE databases and the Cochrane Library were searched for publi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of gynecologic oncology 2018, 29(2), , pp.1-18
Main Authors: Shim, Seung Hyuk, Kim, Soo Nyung, Chae, Su Hyun, Kim, Jung Eun, Lee, Sun Joo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Few data exist regarding adjuvant hysterectomy (AH) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. We investigated the effect of AH on prognosis in LACC patients, through meta-analysis. EMBASE and MEDLINE databases and the Cochrane Library were searched for published studies comparing LACC patients who received AH after chemoradiotherapy with those who did not, through April 2016. Endpoints were mortality and recurrence rates. For pooled estimates of the effect of AH on mortality/recurrence, random- or fixed-effects meta-analytical models were used. Two randomized trials and six observational studies (AH following chemoradiotherapy, 630 patients; chemoradiotherapy, 585 patients) met our search criteria. Fixed-effects model-based meta-analysis indicated no significant difference in mortality between the groups (odds ratio [OR]=1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.58-1.78; p=0.968) with low cross-study heterogeneity (p=0.73 and I²=0.0). This pattern was observed in subgroup analysis for study design, radiation type, response after chemoradiotherapy, and hysterectomy type. The pooled OR for AH and recurrence was 0.59 (95% CI=0.44-0.79; p
ISSN:2005-0380
2005-0399
DOI:10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e25