Effect of Perfluorobutane Microbubbles on Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Suppression of Steam Popping and Its Clinical Implication

• Published in: Korean journal of radiology 2020, 21(9), , pp.1077-1086
• Main Authors: Jeong, Dong Young, Kang, Tae Wook, Min, Ji Hye, Song, Kyoung Doo, Lee, Min Woo, Rhim, Hyunchul, Lim, Hyo Keun, Sinn, Dong Hyun, Han, Heewon
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ablation; Aged; Ascites; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - therapy; Case-Control Studies; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Electrodes; Female; Ferric Compounds - therapeutic use; Fluorocarbons - chemistry; Gastrointestinal Imaging; Humans; Iron - therapeutic use; Laboratories; Liver cancer; Liver diseases; Liver Neoplasms - pathology; Liver Neoplasms - therapy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Male; Microbubbles; Middle Aged; Oxides - therapeutic use; Patients; Radiofrequency Ablation - methods; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography; 방사선과학
• ISSN: 1229-6929; 2005-8330
• DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0910

To evaluate the effect of perfluorobutane microbubbles (Sonazoid®, GE Healthcare) on steam popping during radiofrequency (RF) ablation for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to assess whether popping affects treatment outcomes. The institutional review board approved this retrospective study, which included 90 consecutive patients with single HCC, who received percutaneous RF ablation as the first-line treatment. The patients were divided into two groups, based on the presence or absence of the popping phenomenon, which was defined as an audible sound with a simultaneous sudden explosion within the ablation zone as detected via ultrasonography during the procedure. The factors contributing to the popping phenomenon were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Local tumor progression (LTP) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test for performing comparisons between the two groups. The overall incidence of the popping phenomenon was 25.8% (24/93). Sonazoid® was used in 1 patient (4.2%) in the popping group (n = 24), while it was used in 15 patients (21.7%) in the non-popping group (n = 69). Multivariable analysis revealed that the use of Sonazoid® was the only significant factor for absence of the popping phenomenon (odds ratio = 0.10, = 0.048). There were no significant differences in cumulative LTP and DFS between the two groups ( = 0.479 and = 0.424, respectively). The use of Sonazoid® has a suppressive effect on the popping phenomenon during RF ablation in patients with HCC. However, the presence of the popping phenomenon may not affect clinical outcomes.