Loading…

Electrostatic force distribution on an electrodynamic screen

The enormous potential of solar energy harvesting plants to provide clean energy is severely limited by dust accumulation on their optical surfaces. In lieu of the most commonly-practiced manual cleaning method of using high-pressure water jets, electrodynamic screen (EDS) technology offers an attra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of electrostatics 2016-06, Vol.81 (C), p.24-36
Main Authors: Sayyah, Arash, Horenstein, Mark N., Mazumder, Malay K., Ahmadi, Goodarz
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The enormous potential of solar energy harvesting plants to provide clean energy is severely limited by dust accumulation on their optical surfaces. In lieu of the most commonly-practiced manual cleaning method of using high-pressure water jets, electrodynamic screen (EDS) technology offers an attractive solution for removing dust particles from optical surfaces using electrostatic forces. In this paper, the impacts of different EDS design parameters in the electric field distribution on an EDS have been studied. Furthermore, based on electric field expressions, closed-form solutions for multipolar dielectrophoretic (DEP) forces in the EDS application are provided. Detailed evaluation of the EDS performance necessitates investigation of different forces involved in the dust removal process. Different comparisons are made between repelling and attracting forces exerted on dust particles deposited on an EDS surface. These comparisons elucidate EDS performance in the removal of a given size range of dust particles. The significant detrimental impact of relative humidity upon the dust removal process is quantitatively addressed. It is shown how just a 10 percent increase in relative humidity can make the repelling force ineffective in the dust removal process. [Display omitted] •The impacts of different EDS design parameters in the electric field distribution have been thoroughly studied.•Closed-form expressions for multipolar dielectrophoretic (DEP) forces up to third-order have been derived.•Different comparisons have been made between adhesion and repelling forces in dust removal process.•Detrimental impact of relative humidity increase in the EDS performance has been quantitatively addressed.
ISSN:0304-3886
1873-5738
DOI:10.1016/j.elstat.2016.02.004