Loading…

Spin-triplet supercurrent in Josephson junctions containing a synthetic antiferromagnet with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy

We present measurements of Josephson junctions containing three magnetic layers with noncollinear magnetizations. The junctions are of the form S/F′/N/F/N/F″/S, where S is superconducting Nb, F′ is either a thin Ni or Permalloy layer with in-plane magnetization, N is the normal metal Cu, F is a synt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physical review. B 2017-12, Vol.96 (22), Article 224515
Main Authors: Glick, Joseph A., Edwards, Samuel, Korucu, Demet, Aguilar, Victor, Niedzielski, Bethany M., Loloee, Reza, Pratt, W. P., Birge, Norman O., Kotula, P. G., Missert, N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We present measurements of Josephson junctions containing three magnetic layers with noncollinear magnetizations. The junctions are of the form S/F′/N/F/N/F″/S, where S is superconducting Nb, F′ is either a thin Ni or Permalloy layer with in-plane magnetization, N is the normal metal Cu, F is a synthetic antiferromagnet with magnetization perpendicular to the plane, composed of Pd/Co multilayers on either side of a thin Ru spacer, and F″ is a thin Ni layer with in-plane magnetization. The supercurrent in these junctions decays more slowly as a function of the F-layer thickness than for similar spin-singlet junctions not containing the F′ and F″ layers. The slower decay is the prime signature that the supercurrent in the central part of these junctions is carried by spin-triplet pairs. The junctions containing F′= Permalloy are suitable for future experiments where either the amplitude of the critical current or the ground-state phase difference across the junction is controlled by changing the relative orientations of the magnetizations of the F′ and F″ layers.
ISSN:2469-9950
2469-9969
DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.224515