Estimation of Tropical Cyclone Intensity in the North Atlantic and Northeastern Pacific Basins Using TRMM Satellite Passive Microwave Observations

• Published in: Journal of applied meteorology and climatology 2019-02, Vol.58 (2), p.185-197
• Main Authors: Jiang, Haiyan, Tao, Cheng, Pei, Yongxian
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aircraft; Algorithms; Atmospheric precipitations; Basins; Brightness temperature; Cyclones; Dependent variables; Estimation; Flight tests; GEOSCIENCES; Hurricanes; Mathematical models; Meteorological satellites; Microwave communications; Neural networks; Precipitation; Rain; Rainfall; Reconnaissance aircraft; Regression analysis; Regression models; Satellite observation; Satellite observations; Satellites; Statistical analysis; Statistical methods; Storms; Surface wind; Temperature; TRMM satellite; Tropical climate; Tropical cyclone intensities; Tropical cyclones; Tropical rainfall; Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM); Winds
• ISSN: 1558-8424; 1558-8432
• DOI: 10.1175/jamc-d-18-0094.1

A statistical passive microwave intensity estimation (PMW-IE) algorithm for estimating the intensity of tropical cyclones (TCs) in the North Atlantic and northeastern and central Pacific basins is developed and tested. The algorithm is derived from Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Microwave Imager (TMI) 85-GHz brightness temperatures and near-surface rain-rate retrievals to provide objective estimates of current maximum sustained surface winds (Vmax) and 6-h future Vmax of TCs. The full record of TRMM data (1998–2013) including 2326 TMI overpasses of 503 TCs is separated into dependent samples (1998–2010) for model development and independent samples (2011–13) for model verification. The best track intensities are used as dependent variables in a stepwise multiple-regression approach. Separately for each basin, three regression models are derived using selected 1) 85-GHz-only variables, 2) rain-rate-only variables, and 3) combined 85-GHz and rain variables. The algorithms are evaluated using independent samples and those with contemporaneous aircraft-reconnaissance measurements. Rain-only and combined models perform better than the 85-GHz-only model. Lower errors are found for estimating the 6-h future Vmax than estimating the current Vmax using all three models. This suggests that it is optimal to use passive-microwave-retrieved rain variables observed a few hours earlier to estimate TC intensity. The MAE (RMSE) of 6-h future Vmax is 9 (12) kt (1 kt ≈ 0.51 m s−1) when testing the combined models with ATL and EPA independent samples. Aircraft-reconnaissance-based independent samples yields a MAE of 9.6 kt and RMSE of 12.6 kt for estimating 6-h future Vmax.