Large eddy simulation of premixed turbulent combustion using a non-adiabatic, strain-sensitive flamelet approach

• Published in: Combustion and flame 2021-12, Vol.234 (C), p.111655, Article 111655
• Main Authors: Tang, Yihao, Raman, Venkat
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accounting; Adiabatic flow; Boundaries; Counterflow; Counterflow premixed flame; Flamelet generated manifold; Heat; Heat loss; Jet flow; Large eddy simulation; Manifolds; Model accuracy; Premixed flames; Quenching; Stagnation point; Strain; Strain rate; Tabulation; Turbulent combustion; Turbulent flames; Turbulent premixed combustion
• ISSN: 0010-2180; 1556-2921
• DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111655

In this study, a novel strained, non-adiabatic flamelet generated manifold (FGM) model is developed based on a counterflow premixed flame. The different levels of strain and heat loss are introduced into the flamelets by varying the stagnation point strain rate and burnt temperature of the counterflow configuration. The strain rate response of these flamelets is found to exhibit different extinction patterns for different ranges of burnt temperature. A priori studies are performed to compare the phase-space flame structures of the strained and unstrained flamelets. It is found that the strained flamelet degenerates towards the unstrained flamelet with burnt temperature decreasing. A bifurcation burnt temperature is further defined that separates the two types of flamelet quenching that are driven by strain and heat loss. An appropriate set of tabulation parameters is chosen that preserves the uniqueness of mapping between the manifold and the populated flamelets. The external boundaries of the tabulations are defined, where the proposed model degenerates into the conventional unstrained/non-adiabatic FGM manifold. Internal tabulation boundaries are defined to distinguish different combustion modes among stable combustion, strain-induced quenching, and heat-loss-induced quenching. The model is validated using large eddy simulation (LES) of a confined turbulent premixed jet flame. The proposed FGM model vastly increases accuracy of predictions when both strain and heat loss effects are included. Without accounting for these effects, there are discrepancies in the prediction of flame height and temperature as compared with experimental data. An analysis of the dominant physical process (strain, heat loss) that contributes to the evolution of the turbulent flame is performed.