Loading…

Systems Analysis of Ionic Liquids for Post-combustion CO2 Capture at Coal-fired Power Plants

The main objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility and costs of ionic liquid (IL)-based CO2 capture systems at pulverized coal-fired (PC) power plants. The IL selected for this assessment is trihexyl- (tetradecyl)phosphonium 2-cyanopyrrolide ([P66614][2-CNpyr]), achieving a 1:1 and r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy procedia 2014, Vol.63 (C), p.1321-1328
Main Authors: Zhai, Haibo, Rubin, Edward S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The main objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility and costs of ionic liquid (IL)-based CO2 capture systems at pulverized coal-fired (PC) power plants. The IL selected for this assessment is trihexyl- (tetradecyl)phosphonium 2-cyanopyrrolide ([P66614][2-CNpyr]), achieving a 1:1 and reversible chemical reaction between [2-CNpyr]− and CO2. A multi-stage equilibrium-based modeling framework is established to simulate the adiabatic absorption process, whereas a single-stage flash drum in equilibrium is employed for the stripping process. The performance model is linked to an engineering-economic model that estimates the capital cost, annual operating and maintenance (O&M) costs, and total levelized annual cost. The technical and cost models are applied to estimate the cost of CO2 captured by an IL-based CCS system. The preliminary results show that for 90% CO2 capture, the capture cost would be higher than the U.S. Department of Energy's target at $40 per metric ton of CO2 captured for new generation technologies, mainly due to a large capital cost. However, current process designs are not yet optimized. Based on the cost of CO2 captured, the most cost-effective capture cost is found to be at a removal efficiency of about 85% for CO2.
ISSN:1876-6102
1876-6102
DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.141