Loading…
Results of a peripheral cutting balloon prospective multicenter European registry in hemodialysis vascular access
To report initial experience with the Peripheral Cutting Balloon (PCB) in treatment of failing hemodialysis shunts. A total of 190 patients (95 men, 95 women; average age 64.4 +/- 11.9 years, range 32-87 years) who were treated with the PCB for pressure-resistant stenosis, restenosis or failed percu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cardiovascular and interventional radiology 2007-04, Vol.30 (2), p.212-215 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | To report initial experience with the Peripheral Cutting Balloon (PCB) in treatment of failing hemodialysis shunts.
A total of 190 patients (95 men, 95 women; average age 64.4 +/- 11.9 years, range 32-87 years) who were treated with the PCB for pressure-resistant stenosis, restenosis or failed percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the venous limb of an arteriovenous shunt were followed in seven European centers using a simple registry. The group consisted of 109 de novo lesions (57%) and 79 restenotic lesions (43%).
Technical success was achieved in 88.9% of cases. Primary patency was as follows (the results for whole group and simultaneous results for de novo lesions and restenoses are presented): 1 month (140 patients followed): 94%, 98%, and 93%; 3 months (116 patients followed): 93%, 98%, and 92%; 6 months (40 patients followed): 85%, 92%, and 79%; 12 months (27 patients followed): 74%, 87%, and 48%. No complication occurred. Patients experienced an equal or lower level of pain during the procedure compared with conventional PTA.
The PCB proved to be successful in dilating pressure-resistant stenoses. We cannot conclude whether PCB angioplasty can lower the restenosis rate in hemodialysis access lesions, but the long-term patency for de novo lesions is high. A further randomized study is advisable. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0174-1551 1432-086X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00270-006-0020-0 |