Loading…
Weighing decoupling vs. lost revenues: Regulatory considerations
In 1989 a resolution adopted by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners expressly recognized that utilities lose revenues and profits when they or their customers invest in cost-effective energy efficiency. NARUC called for reform of regulation so that the successful implementat...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Electricity journal 1992-11, Vol.5 (9), p.58-63 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In 1989 a resolution adopted by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners expressly recognized that utilities lose revenues and profits when they or their customers invest in cost-effective energy efficiency. NARUC called for reform of regulation so that the successful implementation of a utility's least-cost plan was also its most profitable course of action. NARUC said that regulation should align the utility's financial interest with the interests of its customers. Much of the effort to align utility shareholders' financial interests with the goals of least-cost planning has focused on the removal of the potent disincentives to energy efficiency created by the current ratesetting process. Decoupling and lost revenue recovery are the two general approaches used to eliminate the disincentives. This paper discusses the important characteristics and distinctions between the two options. 1 tab. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1040-6190 1873-6874 |
DOI: | 10.1016/1040-6190(92)90096-P |