Loading…

Deviation of residual stress patterns in 52 100 bearing steel due to inherent microstructural transformations after rolling contact

A previous publication proved empirically that residual stresses in 52 100 bearing steel are caused mainly by microstructural transformations during rolling contact. It also introduced a model estimating the magnitude of residual stresses resulting from microstructural transformations. The results f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Materials characterization 2004-12, Vol.53 (5), p.381-393
Main Authors: Rivero, Iris V., Ruud, Clayton O.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A previous publication proved empirically that residual stresses in 52 100 bearing steel are caused mainly by microstructural transformations during rolling contact. It also introduced a model estimating the magnitude of residual stresses resulting from microstructural transformations. The results from this model prompted this study because the model showed a discrepancy between the measured results and the magnitude of the estimated residual stresses derived from the model. This study uses metallurgical analysis and modeling to explain why the measured and estimated magnitudes of residual stresses did not coincide. Metallurgical analysis explains the roles of retained austenite transformation and martensite decay in the ultimate magnitude of residual stresses at the surface of the bearing balls after rolling contact. The model estimates the magnitude of expected residual stresses due to martensite decay and suggests the number of cycles that bearing balls can operate under the beneficial effects of compressive residual stresses without spalling.
ISSN:1044-5803
1873-4189
DOI:10.1016/j.matchar.2004.08.007