Loading…

Performance analysis of embedded software using implicit path enumeration

Embedded computer systems are characterized by the presence of a processor running application-specific dedicated software. A large number of these systems must satisfy real-time constraints. This paper examines the problem of determining the extreme (best and worst) case bounds on the running time...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on computer-aided design of integrated circuits and systems 1997-12, Vol.16 (12), p.1477-1487
Main Authors: Li, Y.-T.S., Malik, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Embedded computer systems are characterized by the presence of a processor running application-specific dedicated software. A large number of these systems must satisfy real-time constraints. This paper examines the problem of determining the extreme (best and worst) case bounds on the running time of a given program on a given processor. This has several applications in the design of embedded systems with real-time constraints. An important aspect of this problem is determining which paths in the program are exercised in the extreme cases. The state-of-the-art solution here relies on an explicit enumeration of program paths. This solution runs out of steam rather quickly since the number of feasible program paths is typically exponential in the size of the program. We present a solution for this problem that does not require an explicit enumeration of program paths, i.e., the paths are considered implicitly. This solution is implemented in the program cinderella (in recognition of her hard real-time constraint-she had to be back home at the stroke of midnight), which currently targets a popular embedded processor-the Intel i960. The preliminary results of using this tool are also presented here.
ISSN:0278-0070
1937-4151
DOI:10.1109/43.664229