Which Mask is the Most Efficient: A Pattern or a Noise? It Depends on the Task

The aim of the paper is to test the hypothesis that masking efficiency is related to the mask energy on the spatial frequency (SF) range critical to the task, irrespective on whether the mask is a noise or a pattern. Two experiments were run inwhich targets werefragmented forms of objects masked atv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Visual cognition 1998-09, Vol.5 (3), p.313-338
Main Author: Delord, Sandrine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Perception
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Vision
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of the paper is to test the hypothesis that masking efficiency is related to the mask energy on the spatial frequency (SF) range critical to the task, irrespective on whether the mask is a noise or a pattern. Two experiments were run inwhich targets werefragmented forms of objects masked atvarious intervals either by apattern orby thethreenoisemasks varying in the size of theirelements. In Experiment1, in which participants had to discriminate the targetglobal shape (oval vs. round), masking efficiency was directly related to the mask energy on the low SFs critical to this task, whatever the mask. This conclusion extends to the medium to high SF ranges critical to the naming task used in Experiment 2. These results are not compatible with the qualitative noise/pattern distinction used by Turvey (1973) to operationalize his integration/interruption conception of masking. An interpretation in terms of early interactions between SF channels better account for the results.
ISSN:1350-6285
1464-0716
DOI:10.1080/713756789