Loading…

Outcomes of sustained-release formulation of valproate and topiramate monotherapy in patients with epilepsy: a multi-centre, cohort study

New-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) tend to replace traditional AEDs as the first-line choice for epilepsy. However, whether this change results in better outcome, especially in China, remains unknown. Two broad spectrum AEDs, the traditional drug of sustained-release formulation of valproate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2012-12, Vol.7 (12), p.e47982
Main Authors: Hu, Yida, Huang, Xishun, Shen, Dinglie, Ding, Meiping, Sun, Hongbin, Peng, Bin, Hu, Xiangshu, Li, Hua, Zeng, Kebin, Xi, Zhiqin, Zhang, Ying, Cao, Qingqing, Liu, Jing, Zhou, Yan, Wu, Mengjiao, Lu, Yaodong, Chen, Guojun, Wang, Xuefeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:New-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) tend to replace traditional AEDs as the first-line choice for epilepsy. However, whether this change results in better outcome, especially in China, remains unknown. Two broad spectrum AEDs, the traditional drug of sustained-release formulation of valproate (SRVPA) and the new-generation drug of topiramate, were compared in patients with epilepsy as monotherapy in this multi-centre, observational cohort study from 2000 to 2011. The primary outcome was time to treatment failure. The secondary outcomes included time to first seizure, time to 12-month remission, and time to 24-month remission. Drug tolerability was assessed. Cox proportional hazard models (95% confidence interval [CI]) were used to analyse the relative risks expressed as hazard ratios (HR). Of the 1008 recruited patients, 519 received SRVPA and 489 received topiramate. SRVPA was better than topiramate (28.3% vs. 41.5%; HR = 0.62, [95% CI 0.49-0.77]; p
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0047982