You are what you eat: food limitation affects reproductive fitness in a sexually cannibalistic praying mantid

• Published in: PloS one 2013-10, Vol.8 (10), p.e78164-e78164
• Main Author: Barry, Katherine L
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abdomen; Animal behavior; Animal reproduction; Animals; Body parts; Cannibalism; Conservation; Diet; Dietary restrictions; Eating; Environmental conditions; Evolution; Fecundity; Feeding; Feeding regimes; Female; Females; Fertility; Fitness; Food; Food intake; Insects; Laboratories; Life history; Male; Males; Mantidae; Mantodea - physiology; Morphology; Predators; Reproduction; Reproductive fitness; Resource allocation; Resource conservation; Resource scheduling; Sperm; Success
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078164

Resource limitation during the juvenile stages frequently results in developmental delays and reduced size at maturity, and dietary restriction during adulthood can affect longevity and reproductive output. Variation in food intake can also result in alteration to the normal pattern of resource allocation among body parts or life-history stages. My primary aim in this study was to determine how varying juvenile and/or adult feeding regimes affect particular female and male traits in the sexually cannibalistic praying mantid Pseudomantis albofimbriata. Praying mantids are sit-and-wait predators whose resource intake can vary dramatically depending on environmental conditions within and across seasons, making them useful for studying the effects of feeding regime on various facets of reproductive fitness. In this study, there was a significant trend/difference in development and morphology for males and females as a result of juvenile feeding treatment, however, its effect on the fitness components measured for males was much greater than on those measured for females. Food-limited males were less likely to find a female during field enclosure experiments and smaller males were slower at finding a female in field-based experiments, providing some of the first empirical evidence of a large male size advantage for scrambling males. Only adult food limitation affected female fecundity, and the ability of a female to chemically attract males was also most notably affected by adult feeding regime (although juvenile food limitation did play a role). Furthermore, the significant difference/trend in all male traits and the lack of difference in male trait ratios between treatments suggests a proportional distribution of resources and, therefore, no trait conservation by food-limited males. This study provides evidence that males and females are under different selective pressures with respect to resource acquisition and is also one of very few to show an effect of juvenile food quantity on adult reproductive fitness in a hemimetabolous insect.