Loading…

Individualism and the extended-self: cross-cultural differences in the valuation of authentic objects

The current studies examine how valuation of authentic items varies as a function of culture. We find that U.S. respondents value authentic items associated with individual persons (a sweater or an artwork) more than Indian respondents, but that both cultures value authentic objects not associated w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2014-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e90787-e90787
Main Authors: Gjersoe, Nathalia L, Newman, George E, Chituc, Vladimir, Hood, Bruce
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c08ac05a0424eb2010c1558b9bf2f70546cfe8e93f7cf57ee79342d61851fead3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c08ac05a0424eb2010c1558b9bf2f70546cfe8e93f7cf57ee79342d61851fead3
container_end_page e90787
container_issue 3
container_start_page e90787
container_title PloS one
container_volume 9
creator Gjersoe, Nathalia L
Newman, George E
Chituc, Vladimir
Hood, Bruce
description The current studies examine how valuation of authentic items varies as a function of culture. We find that U.S. respondents value authentic items associated with individual persons (a sweater or an artwork) more than Indian respondents, but that both cultures value authentic objects not associated with persons (a dinosaur bone or a moon rock) equally. These differences cannot be attributed to more general cultural differences in the value assigned to authenticity. Rather, the results support the hypothesis that individualistic cultures place a greater value on objects associated with unique persons and in so doing, offer the first evidence for how valuation of certain authentic items may vary cross-culturally.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0090787
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1509205520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478754468</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b72855fa0a63427a8d93bd8445fff18e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478754468</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c08ac05a0424eb2010c1558b9bf2f70546cfe8e93f7cf57ee79342d61851fead3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNU1uL1DAYLaK46-g_EC0Iog8dc-3FB2FZvAwsLHh7DWnyZSZDJlmbdtB_bzrTXaayD5KHhq_nnO-S82XZc4yWmFb43TYMnZdueRM8LBFqUFVXD7Jz3FBSlATRhyf3s-xJjFuEOK3L8nF2RljJa0ar8wxWXtu91YN0Nu5y6XXebyCH3z14DbqI4Mz7XHUhxkINrh866XJtjYEOvIKYW38g7KUbZG-Dz4PJ5ZBCvrcqD-0WVB-fZo-MdBGeTd9F9uPTx--XX4qr68-ry4urQpUN6QuFaqkQl4gRBi1BGCnMed02rSGmQpyVykANDTWVMrwCqBrKiC5xzbEBqekie3nUvXEhimlCUWCOGoI4T5NYZKsjQge5FTed3cnujwjSikMgdGshu1S5A9FWpObcSCTLlKWStW5oq2vGuDEG15C0PkzZhnYHWqWW03RmovM_3m7EOuwFbUpCSZ0E3kwCXfg1QOzFzkYFzkkPYRjrxuPDUj7W_eof6P3dTai1TA1Yb0LKq0ZRccGSPzhj5Zh2eQ8qHQ07q5KdjE3xGeHtjJAwfXLIWg4xitW3r_-Pvf45x74-wW5Aun4TgxtGH8U5kB2BByN2YO6GjJEYt-F2GmLcBjFtQ6K9OH2gO9Kt_elfwZ0FvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1509205520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Individualism and the extended-self: cross-cultural differences in the valuation of authentic objects</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Gjersoe, Nathalia L ; Newman, George E ; Chituc, Vladimir ; Hood, Bruce</creator><contributor>Bastian, Brock</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gjersoe, Nathalia L ; Newman, George E ; Chituc, Vladimir ; Hood, Bruce ; Bastian, Brock</creatorcontrib><description>The current studies examine how valuation of authentic items varies as a function of culture. We find that U.S. respondents value authentic items associated with individual persons (a sweater or an artwork) more than Indian respondents, but that both cultures value authentic objects not associated with persons (a dinosaur bone or a moon rock) equally. These differences cannot be attributed to more general cultural differences in the value assigned to authenticity. Rather, the results support the hypothesis that individualistic cultures place a greater value on objects associated with unique persons and in so doing, offer the first evidence for how valuation of certain authentic items may vary cross-culturally.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090787</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24658437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Authenticity ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Celebrities ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Collectivism ; Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Culture ; Female ; Humans ; India ; Individualism ; Individuality ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Moon ; Social Sciences ; Social Values ; United States ; Valuation</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e90787-e90787</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Gjersoe et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Gjersoe et al 2014 Gjersoe et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c08ac05a0424eb2010c1558b9bf2f70546cfe8e93f7cf57ee79342d61851fead3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c08ac05a0424eb2010c1558b9bf2f70546cfe8e93f7cf57ee79342d61851fead3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1509205520/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1509205520?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24658437$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Bastian, Brock</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gjersoe, Nathalia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, George E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chituc, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hood, Bruce</creatorcontrib><title>Individualism and the extended-self: cross-cultural differences in the valuation of authentic objects</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The current studies examine how valuation of authentic items varies as a function of culture. We find that U.S. respondents value authentic items associated with individual persons (a sweater or an artwork) more than Indian respondents, but that both cultures value authentic objects not associated with persons (a dinosaur bone or a moon rock) equally. These differences cannot be attributed to more general cultural differences in the value assigned to authenticity. Rather, the results support the hypothesis that individualistic cultures place a greater value on objects associated with unique persons and in so doing, offer the first evidence for how valuation of certain authentic items may vary cross-culturally.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Authenticity</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Celebrities</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Collectivism</subject><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Individualism</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Moon</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social Values</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNU1uL1DAYLaK46-g_EC0Iog8dc-3FB2FZvAwsLHh7DWnyZSZDJlmbdtB_bzrTXaayD5KHhq_nnO-S82XZc4yWmFb43TYMnZdueRM8LBFqUFVXD7Jz3FBSlATRhyf3s-xJjFuEOK3L8nF2RljJa0ar8wxWXtu91YN0Nu5y6XXebyCH3z14DbqI4Mz7XHUhxkINrh866XJtjYEOvIKYW38g7KUbZG-Dz4PJ5ZBCvrcqD-0WVB-fZo-MdBGeTd9F9uPTx--XX4qr68-ry4urQpUN6QuFaqkQl4gRBi1BGCnMed02rSGmQpyVykANDTWVMrwCqBrKiC5xzbEBqekie3nUvXEhimlCUWCOGoI4T5NYZKsjQge5FTed3cnujwjSikMgdGshu1S5A9FWpObcSCTLlKWStW5oq2vGuDEG15C0PkzZhnYHWqWW03RmovM_3m7EOuwFbUpCSZ0E3kwCXfg1QOzFzkYFzkkPYRjrxuPDUj7W_eof6P3dTai1TA1Yb0LKq0ZRccGSPzhj5Zh2eQ8qHQ07q5KdjE3xGeHtjJAwfXLIWg4xitW3r_-Pvf45x74-wW5Aun4TgxtGH8U5kB2BByN2YO6GjJEYt-F2GmLcBjFtQ6K9OH2gO9Kt_elfwZ0FvA</recordid><startdate>20140321</startdate><enddate>20140321</enddate><creator>Gjersoe, Nathalia L</creator><creator>Newman, George E</creator><creator>Chituc, Vladimir</creator><creator>Hood, Bruce</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140321</creationdate><title>Individualism and the extended-self: cross-cultural differences in the valuation of authentic objects</title><author>Gjersoe, Nathalia L ; Newman, George E ; Chituc, Vladimir ; Hood, Bruce</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c08ac05a0424eb2010c1558b9bf2f70546cfe8e93f7cf57ee79342d61851fead3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Authenticity</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Celebrities</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Collectivism</topic><topic>Cross-Cultural Comparison</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Individualism</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Moon</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social Values</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gjersoe, Nathalia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, George E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chituc, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hood, Bruce</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gjersoe, Nathalia L</au><au>Newman, George E</au><au>Chituc, Vladimir</au><au>Hood, Bruce</au><au>Bastian, Brock</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Individualism and the extended-self: cross-cultural differences in the valuation of authentic objects</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-03-21</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e90787</spage><epage>e90787</epage><pages>e90787-e90787</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The current studies examine how valuation of authentic items varies as a function of culture. We find that U.S. respondents value authentic items associated with individual persons (a sweater or an artwork) more than Indian respondents, but that both cultures value authentic objects not associated with persons (a dinosaur bone or a moon rock) equally. These differences cannot be attributed to more general cultural differences in the value assigned to authenticity. Rather, the results support the hypothesis that individualistic cultures place a greater value on objects associated with unique persons and in so doing, offer the first evidence for how valuation of certain authentic items may vary cross-culturally.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24658437</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0090787</doi><tpages>e90787</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2014-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e90787-e90787
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1509205520
source PubMed Central (Open Access); ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Adult
Authenticity
Biology and Life Sciences
Celebrities
Cognition & reasoning
Collectivism
Cross-Cultural Comparison
Culture
Female
Humans
India
Individualism
Individuality
Male
Medicine and Health Sciences
Moon
Social Sciences
Social Values
United States
Valuation
title Individualism and the extended-self: cross-cultural differences in the valuation of authentic objects
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A14%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Individualism%20and%20the%20extended-self:%20cross-cultural%20differences%20in%20the%20valuation%20of%20authentic%20objects&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Gjersoe,%20Nathalia%20L&rft.date=2014-03-21&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e90787&rft.epage=e90787&rft.pages=e90787-e90787&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0090787&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478754468%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c08ac05a0424eb2010c1558b9bf2f70546cfe8e93f7cf57ee79342d61851fead3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1509205520&rft_id=info:pmid/24658437&rft_galeid=A478754468&rfr_iscdi=true