A conceptual framework for evaluating impairments in myasthenia gravis

• Published in: PloS one 2014-05, Vol.9 (5), p.e98089-e98089
• Main Authors: Barnett, Carolina, Bril, Vera, Kapral, Moira, Kulkarni, Abhaya, Davis, Aileen M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Biology and Life Sciences; Content analysis; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Fatigue; Female; Health care networks; Humans; Impairment; Interviews; Limbs; Male; Medical research; Medicine and Health Sciences; Middle Aged; Muscles; Myasthenia; Myasthenia gravis; Myasthenia Gravis - diagnosis; Neurology; Neuromuscular junctions; Patients; Product development; Qualitative research; Research and Analysis Methods; Severity of Illness Index; Surveys and Questionnaires; Variations
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098089

Myasthenia gravis is characterized by weakness and fatigability of different muscle groups, including ocular, bulbar and the limbs. Therefore, a measure of disease severity at the impairment level in myasthenia needs to reflect all the relevant impairments, as well as their variations with activity and fatigue. We conducted a qualitative study of patients with myasthenia, to explore their experiences and related impairments, aimed at developing a conceptual framework of disease severity at the impairment level in myasthenia gravis. Twenty patients representing the spectrum of disease participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were recorded and the transcripts were analyzed by content analysis using an inductive approach with line-by-line open coding. Themes were generated from these codes. Two main themes were identified: the severity of the impairments and fatigability (i.e., triggering or worsening of an impairment with activity). The impairments were further classified within body regions (ocular, bulbar and axial/limbs). Fatigability was described as a phenomenon affecting the whole body but also affecting specific impairments, and was associated with fluctuation of the symptoms. Patients were concerned that clinical examination at a single point in time might not reflect their true clinical state due to fatigability and fluctuations in severity. This conceptual framework reflects the relevance of both severity and fatigability in understanding impairment-based disease severity in myasthenia. This framework could inform the development of impairment measures in myasthenia gravis.