Shared dosimetry error in epidemiological dose-response analyses

• Published in: PloS one 2015-03, Vol.10 (3), p.e0119418
• Main Authors: Stram, Daniel O, Preston, Dale L, Sokolnikov, Mikhail, Napier, Bruce, Kopecky, Kenneth J, Boice, John, Beck, Harold, Till, John, Bouville, Andre
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Background radiation; Calibration; Cancer; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; Dosimeters; Dosimetry; Epidemiologic Studies; Epidemiology; Error analysis; Estimates; Exposure; Generalized linear models; Health care; Humans; Mathematical analysis; Matrix methods; Maximum likelihood method; Medical Errors - prevention & control; Medical Errors - statistics & numerical data; Monte Carlo Method; Nuclear Power Plants; Null hypothesis; Occupational exposure; Occupational Exposure - analysis; Public health; Radiation; Radiation dosage; Radiation Protection; RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY; Radiometry - methods; Risk; Risk Assessment; Studies; Thyroid; Thyroid diseases; United States; Veterans; Workers
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119418

Radiation dose reconstruction systems for large-scale epidemiological studies are sophisticated both in providing estimates of dose and in representing dosimetry uncertainty. For example, a computer program was used by the Hanford Thyroid Disease Study to provide 100 realizations of possible dose to study participants. The variation in realizations reflected the range of possible dose for each cohort member consistent with the data on dose determinates in the cohort. Another example is the Mayak Worker Dosimetry System 2013 which estimates both external and internal exposures and provides multiple realizations of "possible" dose history to workers given dose determinants. This paper takes up the problem of dealing with complex dosimetry systems that provide multiple realizations of dose in an epidemiologic analysis. In this paper we derive expected scores and the information matrix for a model used widely in radiation epidemiology, namely the linear excess relative risk (ERR) model that allows for a linear dose response (risk in relation to radiation) and distinguishes between modifiers of background rates and of the excess risk due to exposure. We show that treating the mean dose for each individual (calculated by averaging over the realizations) as if it was true dose (ignoring both shared and unshared dosimetry errors) gives asymptotically unbiased estimates (i.e. the score has expectation zero) and valid tests of the null hypothesis that the ERR slope β is zero. Although the score is unbiased the information matrix (and hence the standard errors of the estimate of β) is biased for β≠0 when ignoring errors in dose estimates, and we show how to adjust the information matrix to remove this bias, using the multiple realizations of dose. The use of these methods in the context of several studies including, the Mayak Worker Cohort, and the U.S. Atomic Veterans Study, is discussed.