Loading…

Influence of the definition of "metabolically healthy obesity" on the progression of coronary artery calcification

Debates whether metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) increases the cardiovascular risk might be due to the metabolic instability of MHO or the absence of a perfect definition of MHO. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the influence of the MHO phenotype on the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) prog...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2017-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e0178741-e0178741
Main Authors: Yoon, Ji Won, Jung, Chan-Hyeon, Kim, Min-Kyung, Park, Hyo Eun, Park, Kyong Soo, Jang, Hak Chul, Moon, Min Kyong, Choi, Su-Yeon, Koo, Bo Kyung
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Debates whether metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) increases the cardiovascular risk might be due to the metabolic instability of MHO or the absence of a perfect definition of MHO. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the influence of the MHO phenotype on the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) progression according to definition of MHO. We analyzed a retrospective cohort with a CACS of 0 at baseline and available serial CACS measurements taken ≥ 12 months apart (n = 1,218). Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, and MHO was defined as obesity accompanied by ≤ 1 (MHO class I) or 0 (MHO class II) components of metabolic syndrome (MetS). During a median follow-up of 45 months, 32.2% of MHO class I and 10.2% of MHO class II subjects developed MetS. Compared to non-obese/metabolically healthy subjects (reference group), hazard ratios (HR) for development of MetS were 2.174 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.513-3.124) and 1.166 (95% CI: 0.434-3.129) for MHO class I and II subjects, respectively. The MHO class I subjects showed a significantly increased risk of CACS progression as compared to the reference group (HR: 1.653; 95% CI: 1.144-2.390), whereas MHO class II subjects did not (HR: 1.195; 95% CI: 0.514-2.778). Among subjects with MHO class I, no significant CACS progression was observed in the subjects who maintained metabolic health during follow-up (HR: 1.448; 95% CI: 0.921-2.278). The risks of metabolic deterioration and CACS progression were significant in subjects with MHO class I, but not in those with MHO class II.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0178741