Driving anger and its relationships with type A behavior patterns and trait anger: Differences between professional and non-professional drivers

• Published in: PloS one 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189793-e0189793
• Main Authors: Feng, Zhongxiang, Yang, Miaomiao, Ma, Changxi, Jiang, Kang, Lei, Yewei, Huang, Wenjuan, Huang, Zhipeng, Zhan, Jingjing, Zhou, Muxiong
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anger; Behavior; Biology and Life Sciences; Cardiovascular disease; Disease prevention; Driving ability; Emotions; Engineering; Engineering and Technology; Medicine and Health Sciences; Obstructions; People and Places; Personality; Research and Analysis Methods; Social psychology; Social Sciences; Studies; Traffic; Traffic accidents & safety; Traffic control; Traffic speed; Transport workers; Type A personality; Validity; Vehicles
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189793

The present study examined the types of situations that caused Chinese professional and non-professional drivers to become angry and investigated the differences in driving-elicited anger, considering the influences of type A behavior pattern and trait anger between the two groups. The 20-item revised Driving Anger Scale (DAS) was used to assess a sample of 232 drivers (57% professional, 43% non-professional). The non-professional drivers reported significantly higher levels of anger than the professional drivers on the overall Driving Anger Scale (DAS) and the traffic obstructions and discourtesy subscales. In both groups, the preferred driving speeds were positively related to driving anger. Furthermore, drivers with a type A personality exhibited higher overall driving anger scores and higher anger scores in response to traffic obstructions and slow driving than drivers with a type B personality. Trait anger was significantly related to driving anger in both groups. In the non-professional group, type A behavior patterns (TABPs) and time hurry (TH) were positively correlated with anger evoked by slow driving. In the professional group, TABPs, TH and competitive hostility (CH) were positively related to driving anger, and the TABPs exerted an indirect effect on driving anger by mediating the influence of trait anger. Overall, these findings provide a theoretical basis for implementing targeted interventions for driving anger in both professional and non-professional drivers.