Barriers to and enablers of the implementation of an ICF-based intake tool in clinical otology and audiology practice-A qualitative pre-implementation study

• Published in: PloS one 2018-12, Vol.13 (12), p.e0208797-e0208797
• Main Authors: van Leeuwen, Lisette M, Pronk, Marieke, Merkus, Paul, Goverts, S Theo, Anema, Johannes R, Kramer, Sophia E
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Audiologists; Audiology; Auditory perception; Biology and Life Sciences; Clinical medicine; Core loss; Disability Evaluation; Domains; Electronic records; Fear; Health care; Hearing Disorders - diagnosis; Hearing loss; Humans; Medical personnel; Medical records; Medical research; Medicine and Health Sciences; Motivation; Otolaryngology; Otology; Patients; Pediatrics; People and Places; Physicians; Practice; Professionals; Public health; Qualitative Research; Quality of life; Social Sciences; Surgery; Systematic review; Transcription; Transplants & implants
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208797

The authors are developing an intake tool based on the Brief International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health Core Set for Hearing Loss, by operationalizing its categories into a Patient Reported Outcome Measure. This study was aimed at identifying enablers and barriers to using this tool as perceived by hearing health professionals (HHPs) and patients. Focus groups and interviews were held with HHPs (ENT surgeons, N = 14; audiologists, N = 8) and patients (N = 18). Interview questions were based on the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model. Using the COM-B model and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), transcript fragments were divided into meaning units, which were then categorized into capability-, opportunity- and motivation-related barriers and enablers. These were further specified into TDF domains. HHP barriers included: lack of time to use the tool (O); and fear of being made responsible for addressing any emerging problems, which may be outside the expertise of the HHP (M). Enablers included integration of the tool in the electronic patient record (O); opportunity for the patient to be better prepared for the intake visit (M); and provision of a complete picture of the patient's functioning via the tool (M). Patient' barriers included fear of losing personal contact with the HHP (M); and fear that use of the tool might negatively affect conversations with the HHP (M). Enablers included knowledge on the aim and relevance of the tool (C); expected better self-preparation (M); and a more focused intake (M). These findings suggest that an intervention is needed to enhance HHPs' knowledge, skills and motivation regarding the relevance and the clinical usefulness of the tool. Providing clear and specific information on the purpose of the tool can also enhance patient motivation. For both HHPs and patients, opportunities relating to the (digital) administration and the design of the tool provide additional targets for successful implementation.