Innovations, contestations and fragilities of the health system response to COVID-19 in the Gauteng Province of South Africa

• Published in: PloS one 2021-12, Vol.16 (12), p.e0261339-e0261339
• Main Authors: Rispel, Laetitia C, Marshall, Carol, Matiwane, Busisiwe, Tenza, Immaculate Sabelile
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Case studies; Contact tracing; Coronaviruses; Corruption; COVID-19; COVID-19 - epidemiology; Damage detection; Emergency preparedness; Emergency response; Engineering and Technology; Epidemics; Evaluation; Female; Government Programs - organization & administration; Health care; Health care industry; Health care policy; Health insurance; Health sciences; Human resources; Humans; Infections; Innovations; Intergovernmental relations; Male; Medical care; Medicine and Health Sciences; Pandemics; Politics; Population; Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data; Protective equipment; Public health; Qualitative analysis; Qualitative Research; Quality management; R&D; Research & development; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Social Sciences; South Africa - epidemiology; Surveys and Questionnaires; Technological change
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261339

Gauteng province, with 26.3% of South Africa's population, is the commercial and industrial powerhouse of the country. During the first epidemic wave in 2020, Gauteng accounted for 32.0% of South Africa's reported COVID-19 cases. The aim of this study was to describe the health system response to the COVID-19 pandemic during the first epidemic wave in Gauteng province and to explore the perspectives of key informants on the provincial response. Using an adapted Pandemic Emergency Response Conceptual Framework, this was a qualitative case study design consisting of 36 key informant interviews and a document analysis. We used thematic analysis to identify themes and sub-themes from the qualitative data. Our case study found that Gauteng developed an innovative, multi-sectoral and comprehensive provincial COVID-19 response that aimed to address the dual challenge of saving lives and the economy. However, the interviews revealed multiple perspectives, experiences, contestations and contradictions in the pandemic response. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed and amplified the fragilities of existing systems, reflected in the corruption on personal protective equipment, poor data quality and inappropriate decisions on self-standing field hospitals. Rooted in a chronic under-investment and insufficient focus on the health workforce, the response failed to take into account or deal with their fears, and to incorporate strategies for psychosocial support, and safe working environments. The single-minded focus on COVID-19 exacerbated these fragilities, resulting in a de facto health system lockdown and reported collateral damage. The key informants identified missed opportunities to invest in primary health care, partner with communities and to include the private health sector in the pandemic response. Gauteng province should build on the innovations of the multi-sectoral response to the COVID-19 pandemic, while addressing the contested areas and health system fragilities.