Insufficient yet improving involvement of the global south in top sustainability science publications

• Published in: PloS one 2022-09, Vol.17 (9), p.e0273083-e0273083
• Main Authors: Dangles, Olivier, Struelens, Quentin, Ba, Mame-Penda, Bonzi-Coulibaly, Yvonne, Charvis, Philippe, Emmanuel, Evens, González Almario, Carolina, Hanich, Lahoucine, Koita, Ousmane, León-Velarde, Fabiola, Mburu, Yvonne K, Ntoumi, Francine, Restrepo, Silvia, Vidal, Laurent
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Co authorship; Collaboration; Cooperation; Developing countries; Earth Sciences; Ecology and Environmental Sciences; Environmental aspects; Environmental policy; Ethical standards; Ethics; Gender; History, Philosophy and Sociology of Sciences; Humanities and Social Sciences; Income; LDCs; Management; Medical ethics; Partnerships; People and Places; Publishing industry; Quantitative analysis; Research ethics; Science; Science Policy; Scientists; Social Sciences; Sustainability; Sustainability science; Sustainable development
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273083

The creation of global research partnerships is critical to produce shared knowledge for the implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Sustainability science promotes the coproduction of inter- and transdisciplinary knowledge, with the expectation that studies will be carried out through groups and truly collaborative networks. As a consequence, sustainability research, in particular that published in high impact journals, should lead the way in terms of ethical partnership in scientific collaboration. Here, we examined this issue through a quantitative analysis of the articles published in Nature Sustainability (300 papers by 2135 authors) and Nature (2994 papers by 46,817 authors) from January 2018 to February 2021. Focusing on these journals allowed us to test whether research published under the banner of sustainability science favoured a more equitable involvement of authors from countries belonging to different income categories, by using the journal Nature as a control. While the findings provide evidence of still insufficient involvement of Low-and-Low-Middle-Income-Countries (LLMICs) in Nature Sustainability publications, they also point to promising improvements in the involvement of such authors. Proportionally, there were 4.6 times more authors from LLMICs in Nature Sustainability than in Nature articles, and 68.8-100% of local Global South studies were conducted with host country scientists (reflecting the discouragement of parachute research practices), with local scientists participating in key research steps. We therefore provide evidence of the promising, yet still insufficient, involvement of low-income countries in top sustainability science publications and discuss ongoing initiatives to improve this.