Loading…
Patient safety culture in Austria and recommendations of evidence-based instruments for improving patient safety
This study aimed to investigate the patient safety culture in Austria. We identified factors that contributed to a higher degree of patient safety and subsequently developed evidence-based suggestions on how to improve patient safety culture in hospitals. Moreover, we examined differences in the per...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2022-10, Vol.17 (10), p.e0274805-e0274805 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-8fa7dedd1ca2b66f747399085827b41eb6794163b1bd88a1d05f2ac0ec15d7193 |
container_end_page | e0274805 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e0274805 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Draganovic, Sehad Offermanns, Guido |
description | This study aimed to investigate the patient safety culture in Austria. We identified factors that contributed to a higher degree of patient safety and subsequently developed evidence-based suggestions on how to improve patient safety culture in hospitals. Moreover, we examined differences in the perception of patient safety culture among different professional groups. This study used a cross-sectional design in ten Austrian hospitals (N = 1,525). We analyzed the correlation between ten patient safety culture factors, three background characteristics (descriptive variables), and three outcome variables (patient safety grade, number of adverse events reported, and influence on patient safety). We also conducted an analysis of variance to determine the differences in patient safety culture factors among the various professional groups in hospitals. The findings revealed that all ten factors have considerable potential for improvement. The most highly rated patient safety culture factors were communication openness and supervisor/manager’s expectations and actions promoting safety; whereas, the lowest rated factor was non-punitive response to error. A comparison of the various professional groups showed significant differences in the perception of patient safety culture between nurses, doctors, and other groups. Patient safety culture in Austria seems to have considerable potential for improvement, and patient safety culture factors significantly contribute to patient safety. We determined evidence-based practices as recommendations for improving each of the patient safety factors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0274805 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2725591561</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A722869616</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a0f38c290b5e431a9dc46621bbd87a8f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A722869616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-8fa7dedd1ca2b66f747399085827b41eb6794163b1bd88a1d05f2ac0ec15d7193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7jr6DwQLgujFjPlokvZGGBY_BhZW_LoNaXIyk6VNxqQd3H9vZqfKVvZCcpFw8pz3zTnkFMVzjFaYCvz2OozRq261Dx5WiIiqRuxBcY4bSpacIPrwzvmseJLSNUKM1pw_Ls4oJwzzip4X-89qcOCHMikLw02px24YI5TOl-sxDdGpUnlTRtCh78GbTAefymBLODgDXsOyVQlMTsj0mJEhlTbE0vX7GA7Ob8v9zOFp8ciqLsGzaV8U3z-8_3bxaXl59XFzsb5calbVw7K2ShgwBmtFWs6tqARtGlSzmoi2wtBy0VSY0xa3pq4VNohZojQCjZkRufBF8eKku-9CklOzkiSCMNZgxnEmNifCBHUt99H1Kt7IoJy8DYS4lSoOTncgFbK01qRBLYOKYtUYXXFOcJvNhapt1no3uY1tD0bneqPqZqLzG-92chsOsmGCI4GywOtJIIafI6RB9i5p6DrlIYynd1dV9qYZffkPen91E7VVuQDnbci--igq14KQmjc8t29RrO6h8jLQO51_lnU5Pkt4M0vIzAC_hq0aU5Kbr1_-n736MWdf3WF3oLphl0I33n63OVidQB1DShHs3yZjJI-D8acb8jgYchoM-hu4fwCG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2725591561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient safety culture in Austria and recommendations of evidence-based instruments for improving patient safety</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Draganovic, Sehad ; Offermanns, Guido</creator><contributor>Nausheen, Sidrah</contributor><creatorcontrib>Draganovic, Sehad ; Offermanns, Guido ; Nausheen, Sidrah</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to investigate the patient safety culture in Austria. We identified factors that contributed to a higher degree of patient safety and subsequently developed evidence-based suggestions on how to improve patient safety culture in hospitals. Moreover, we examined differences in the perception of patient safety culture among different professional groups. This study used a cross-sectional design in ten Austrian hospitals (N = 1,525). We analyzed the correlation between ten patient safety culture factors, three background characteristics (descriptive variables), and three outcome variables (patient safety grade, number of adverse events reported, and influence on patient safety). We also conducted an analysis of variance to determine the differences in patient safety culture factors among the various professional groups in hospitals. The findings revealed that all ten factors have considerable potential for improvement. The most highly rated patient safety culture factors were communication openness and supervisor/manager’s expectations and actions promoting safety; whereas, the lowest rated factor was non-punitive response to error. A comparison of the various professional groups showed significant differences in the perception of patient safety culture between nurses, doctors, and other groups. Patient safety culture in Austria seems to have considerable potential for improvement, and patient safety culture factors significantly contribute to patient safety. We determined evidence-based practices as recommendations for improving each of the patient safety factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274805</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36251643</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Consent ; Data collection ; Ethics ; Hospital patients ; Hospitals ; Likert scale ; Medical errors ; Medical personnel ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Patient safety ; Patients ; People and Places ; Perception ; Prevention ; Private schools ; Questionnaires ; Response rates ; Risk factors ; Safety ; Safety and security measures ; Safety factors ; Social Sciences ; Teamwork ; Variables ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-10, Vol.17 (10), p.e0274805-e0274805</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Draganović, Offermanns. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Draganović, Offermanns 2022 Draganović, Offermanns</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-8fa7dedd1ca2b66f747399085827b41eb6794163b1bd88a1d05f2ac0ec15d7193</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4479-2084</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2725591561/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2725591561?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Nausheen, Sidrah</contributor><creatorcontrib>Draganovic, Sehad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Offermanns, Guido</creatorcontrib><title>Patient safety culture in Austria and recommendations of evidence-based instruments for improving patient safety</title><title>PloS one</title><description>This study aimed to investigate the patient safety culture in Austria. We identified factors that contributed to a higher degree of patient safety and subsequently developed evidence-based suggestions on how to improve patient safety culture in hospitals. Moreover, we examined differences in the perception of patient safety culture among different professional groups. This study used a cross-sectional design in ten Austrian hospitals (N = 1,525). We analyzed the correlation between ten patient safety culture factors, three background characteristics (descriptive variables), and three outcome variables (patient safety grade, number of adverse events reported, and influence on patient safety). We also conducted an analysis of variance to determine the differences in patient safety culture factors among the various professional groups in hospitals. The findings revealed that all ten factors have considerable potential for improvement. The most highly rated patient safety culture factors were communication openness and supervisor/manager’s expectations and actions promoting safety; whereas, the lowest rated factor was non-punitive response to error. A comparison of the various professional groups showed significant differences in the perception of patient safety culture between nurses, doctors, and other groups. Patient safety culture in Austria seems to have considerable potential for improvement, and patient safety culture factors significantly contribute to patient safety. We determined evidence-based practices as recommendations for improving each of the patient safety factors.</description><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Hospital patients</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Likert scale</subject><subject>Medical errors</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Private schools</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety and security measures</subject><subject>Safety factors</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7jr6DwQLgujFjPlokvZGGBY_BhZW_LoNaXIyk6VNxqQd3H9vZqfKVvZCcpFw8pz3zTnkFMVzjFaYCvz2OozRq261Dx5WiIiqRuxBcY4bSpacIPrwzvmseJLSNUKM1pw_Ls4oJwzzip4X-89qcOCHMikLw02px24YI5TOl-sxDdGpUnlTRtCh78GbTAefymBLODgDXsOyVQlMTsj0mJEhlTbE0vX7GA7Ob8v9zOFp8ciqLsGzaV8U3z-8_3bxaXl59XFzsb5calbVw7K2ShgwBmtFWs6tqARtGlSzmoi2wtBy0VSY0xa3pq4VNohZojQCjZkRufBF8eKku-9CklOzkiSCMNZgxnEmNifCBHUt99H1Kt7IoJy8DYS4lSoOTncgFbK01qRBLYOKYtUYXXFOcJvNhapt1no3uY1tD0bneqPqZqLzG-92chsOsmGCI4GywOtJIIafI6RB9i5p6DrlIYynd1dV9qYZffkPen91E7VVuQDnbci--igq14KQmjc8t29RrO6h8jLQO51_lnU5Pkt4M0vIzAC_hq0aU5Kbr1_-n736MWdf3WF3oLphl0I33n63OVidQB1DShHs3yZjJI-D8acb8jgYchoM-hu4fwCG</recordid><startdate>20221017</startdate><enddate>20221017</enddate><creator>Draganovic, Sehad</creator><creator>Offermanns, Guido</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4479-2084</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221017</creationdate><title>Patient safety culture in Austria and recommendations of evidence-based instruments for improving patient safety</title><author>Draganovic, Sehad ; Offermanns, Guido</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-8fa7dedd1ca2b66f747399085827b41eb6794163b1bd88a1d05f2ac0ec15d7193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Hospital patients</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Likert scale</topic><topic>Medical errors</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Private schools</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety and security measures</topic><topic>Safety factors</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Draganovic, Sehad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Offermanns, Guido</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Draganovic, Sehad</au><au>Offermanns, Guido</au><au>Nausheen, Sidrah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient safety culture in Austria and recommendations of evidence-based instruments for improving patient safety</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-10-17</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0274805</spage><epage>e0274805</epage><pages>e0274805-e0274805</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to investigate the patient safety culture in Austria. We identified factors that contributed to a higher degree of patient safety and subsequently developed evidence-based suggestions on how to improve patient safety culture in hospitals. Moreover, we examined differences in the perception of patient safety culture among different professional groups. This study used a cross-sectional design in ten Austrian hospitals (N = 1,525). We analyzed the correlation between ten patient safety culture factors, three background characteristics (descriptive variables), and three outcome variables (patient safety grade, number of adverse events reported, and influence on patient safety). We also conducted an analysis of variance to determine the differences in patient safety culture factors among the various professional groups in hospitals. The findings revealed that all ten factors have considerable potential for improvement. The most highly rated patient safety culture factors were communication openness and supervisor/manager’s expectations and actions promoting safety; whereas, the lowest rated factor was non-punitive response to error. A comparison of the various professional groups showed significant differences in the perception of patient safety culture between nurses, doctors, and other groups. Patient safety culture in Austria seems to have considerable potential for improvement, and patient safety culture factors significantly contribute to patient safety. We determined evidence-based practices as recommendations for improving each of the patient safety factors.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36251643</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0274805</doi><tpages>e0274805</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4479-2084</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2022-10, Vol.17 (10), p.e0274805-e0274805 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2725591561 |
source | PubMed (Medline); ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Consent Data collection Ethics Hospital patients Hospitals Likert scale Medical errors Medical personnel Medicine and Health Sciences Patient safety Patients People and Places Perception Prevention Private schools Questionnaires Response rates Risk factors Safety Safety and security measures Safety factors Social Sciences Teamwork Variables Variance analysis |
title | Patient safety culture in Austria and recommendations of evidence-based instruments for improving patient safety |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A59%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20safety%20culture%20in%20Austria%20and%20recommendations%20of%20evidence-based%20instruments%20for%20improving%20patient%20safety&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Draganovic,%20Sehad&rft.date=2022-10-17&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0274805&rft.epage=e0274805&rft.pages=e0274805-e0274805&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0274805&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA722869616%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-8fa7dedd1ca2b66f747399085827b41eb6794163b1bd88a1d05f2ac0ec15d7193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2725591561&rft_id=info:pmid/36251643&rft_galeid=A722869616&rfr_iscdi=true |