Extending the audiogram with loudness growth: The complementarity of electric and acoustic hearing in bimodal patients

• Published in: PloS one 2023-04, Vol.18 (4), p.e0277161-e0277161
• Main Authors: Lambriks, Lars, van Hoof, Marc, George, Erwin, Devocht, Elke
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acoustics; Biology and Life Sciences; Care and treatment; Cochlea; Cochlear Implantation; Cochlear Implants; Complementarity; Complications and side effects; Ears & hearing; Engineering and Technology; Equivalence; Evaluation; Growth curves; Hearing; Hearing Aids; Hearing disorders; Hearing loss; Humans; Listening; Loudness; Medicine and Health Sciences; Patient outcomes; Physical Sciences; Research and Analysis Methods; Social Sciences; Sound; Speech; Speech Perception; Speech recognition; Thresholds; Voice recognition
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277161

Clinically, recording hearing detection thresholds and representing them in an audiogram is the most common way of evaluating hearing loss and starting the fitting of hearing devices. As an extension, we present the loudness audiogram, which does not only show auditory thresholds but also visualizes the full course of loudness growth across frequencies. The benefit of this approach was evaluated in subjects who rely on both electric (cochlear implant) and acoustic (hearing aid) hearing. In a group of 15 bimodal users, loudness growth was measured with the cochlear implant and hearing aid separately using a loudness scaling procedure. Loudness growth curves were constructed, using a novel loudness function, for each modality and then integrated in a graph plotting frequency, stimulus intensity level, and loudness perception. Bimodal benefit, defined as the difference between wearing a cochlear implant and hearing aid together versus wearing only a cochlear implant, was assessed for multiple speech outcomes. Loudness growth was related to bimodal benefit for speech recognition in noise and to some aspects of speech quality. No correlations between loudness and speech in quiet were found. Patients who had predominantly unequal loudness input from the hearing aid, gained more bimodal benefit for speech recognition in noise compared to those patients whose hearing aid provided mainly equivalent input. Results show that loudness growth is related to bimodal benefit for speech recognition in noise and to some aspects of speech quality. Subjects who had different input from the hearing aid compared to CI, generally gained more bimodal benefit compared to those patients whose hearing aid provided mainly equivalent input. This suggests that bimodal fitting to create equal loudness at all frequencies may not always be beneficial for speech recognition.