Bumble Bee Watch community science program increases scientific understanding of an important pollinator group across Canada and the USA

• Published in: PloS one 2024-05, Vol.19 (5), p.e0303335-e0303335
• Main Authors: MacPhail, Victoria J, Hatfield, Richard, Colla, Sheila R
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Bees; Bees - physiology; Biology and Life Sciences; Bumblebees; Canada; Community involvement; Databases, Factual; Datasets; Ecology and Environmental Sciences; Environmental protection; Federal jurisdiction; Genera; Geospatial data; Identification; New records; People and places; Pollination; Pollinators; Science Policy; Science programs; Scientists; Species; United States; Wildlife conservation
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303335

In a time of increasing threats to bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus), it is important to understand their ecology and distribution. As experts are limited in resources to conduct field surveys, there is potential for community scientists to help. The Bumble Bee Watch (BBW) community science program involves volunteers taking photos of bumble bees in Canada and the USA and submitting them, along with geographic and optional plant information, to a website or through an app. Taxon experts then verify the bee species identification. The Bumble Bees of North America database (BBNA) stores data (no photographs) collected and identified by more traditional scientific methods over the same range. Here we compared BBW data to BBNA data over all years and just 2010-2020 to understand the scientific contribution of community scientists to the state of the knowledge about native bumble bees. We found that BBW had similar geographic and species coverage as BBNA. It had records from all 63 provinces, states, and territories where bumble bees occur (including four more than BBNA in 2010-2020), and represented 41 of the 48 species in BBNA (with ten more species than BBNA in 2010-2020). While BBW contributed only 8.50% of records overall, it contributed 25.06% of all records over 2010-2020. BBW confirmed the persistence of species and identified new locations of species, both inside and outside of the previously known extent of occurrences. BBW also contributed a wealth of ecological information, such as unique plant genera and species data for almost all the bee species. Thus, while BBW had fewer bee records than the BBNA database overall, it helped to fill in data gaps and provided novel information, complementing the traditional methods. This community science program is valuable in helping to inform conservation management for bumble bee species.