Loading…

Selective Reconstitution of Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor with Gα q

Identification of the molecular mechanisms that determine specificity of coupling interactions between gastrin-releasing peptide receptors (GRPrs) and their cognate heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins is a fundamental step in understanding the signal transduction cascade initiated by receptor-ligand...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 1997-01, Vol.94 (2), p.751-756
Main Authors: Hellmich, Mark R., Battey, James F., Northup, John K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Identification of the molecular mechanisms that determine specificity of coupling interactions between gastrin-releasing peptide receptors (GRPrs) and their cognate heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins is a fundamental step in understanding the signal transduction cascade initiated by receptor-ligand interaction. To explore these mechanisms in greater detail, we have developed an in situ reconstitution assay in chaotrope-extracted membranes from mouse fibroblasts expressing the GRPr, and we have used it to measure GRPr-catalyzed binding of GTPγ S to purified G protein α subunits. Binding studies with 125I-labeled [D-Tyr6] bombesin (6-13) methyl ester (125I-Tyr-ME), a GRPr specific antagonist, show a single binding site with a Kd = 1.4 nM ± 0.4 (mean ± SD, n = 3) and capacity of 15-22 pmol of receptor per mg of protein in the extracted membrane preparations, representing a 2- to 3-fold enrichment of binding sites compared with the membranes before extraction. Quantitative ligand displacement analysis using various unlabeled GRPr agonists shows a rank order of potency characteristic of the GRPr: bombesin ≥ GRP ≫ neuromedin B. Reconstitution of urea extracted membranes with a purified Gα q showed that receptor-catalyzed binding of GTPγ S was dependent on agonist (GRP) and Gβ γ subunits. The EC50 for GRP was 3.5 nM, which correlates well with the reported Kd of 3.1 nM for GRP binding to GRPr expressed in mouse fibroblasts [Benya, R. V., et al. (1994) Mol. Pharmacol. 46, 235-245]. The apparent Kd for bovine brain Gβ γ in this assay was 60 nM, and the Km for squid retinal Gα q was 90 nM. The GRPr-catalyzed binding of GTPγ S is selective for Gα q, since we did not detect receptor-catalyzed exchange using either Gα i/o or Gα t. These data demonstrate that GRPr can functionally couple to Gα q but not to the pertussis toxin-sensitive Gα i/o or retinal specific Gα t. This in situ receptor reconstitution method will allow molecular characterization of G protein coupling to other heptahelical receptors.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.94.2.751