Loading…
The set theoretical foundations of nonstandard analysis
Nonstandard analysis was developed in [1] within a logic which has a language with finite types. In [2] and [3] the logic is first order and the language is that of set theory. The set theoretical approach can be described in the following setting. Let be a relational structure ( A , ∈) where A is a...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of symbolic logic 1973-06, Vol.38 (2), p.189-192 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Nonstandard analysis was developed in [1] within a logic which has a language with finite types. In [2] and [3] the logic is first order and the language is that of set theory. The set theoretical approach can be described in the following setting.
Let
be a relational structure (
A
, ∈) where
A
is a nonempty set and ∈ is a restriction of the elementhood relation of set theory.
Let Ext be the wf (∀
x
)[(∃
w
)[
w
∈
x
] → [(∀
y
)(∀
z
) [
z
∈
x
↔
z
∈
y
] →
x
=
y
]]. Call
a
fragment
of set theory if
⊧ Ext. By forming a nontrivial ultrapower of
one obtains a structure
which, after canonically embedding
in
, becomes a proper elementary extension of
.
Let
j
embed
canonically in
. Let
be the substructure (
B
′, ∈′) of
where
B
′ is the ∈′-closure of
j(A)
in
B
. That is,
B
′ is the smallest subset of
B
containing
j(A)
such that if
b
∈
B
,
b
′ ∈
B
′ and
⊧
b
∈
b
′ then
b
∈
B
′. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4812 1943-5886 |
DOI: | 10.2307/2272054 |