The Impact of EC2000 on Mechanical Engineering Curricula: A Follow-up Study

The Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) is recognized by the US Department of Education as the sole agency responsible for accreditation of educational programs leading to degrees in engineering, engineering technology, and related engineering areas. A new set of criteria for ac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of mechanical engineering education 2011-07, Vol.39 (3), p.185-194
Main Author: Whiteman, Wayne E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accreditation
Colleges & universities
Curricula
Curriculum development
Degree Requirements
Engineering Education
Engineering Technology
Individualized Instruction
Mechanical engineering
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) is recognized by the US Department of Education as the sole agency responsible for accreditation of educational programs leading to degrees in engineering, engineering technology, and related engineering areas. A new set of criteria for accreditation was established by ABET in the late 1990s, Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000). By 2001, all engineering programs were required to be accredited under the new criteria. The philosophy of EC2000 is to allow institutions and programs to define their mission and objectives to meet the needs of their constituents and enable program differentiation. Emphasis is placed on continuous improvement of programs based on the input of constituents and a process that links outcomes and assessment to program objectives. A preliminary study was conducted by the author in 2000 that looked at the initial effects of EC2000. It examined selected mechanical engineering programs to discern the impact of EC2000 on curriculum development during the initial implementation of the new criteria. Data on the mechanical engineering curricula at nine schools with PhD programs and nine schools without PhD programs were presented. This paper looks at changes since the original study. Current results are also compared with those from a study by Robert E. Mates from the State University of New York at Buffalo entitled a ‘Survey of Undergraduate ME Programs’, conducted in 1987.
ISSN:0306-4190
2050-4586
DOI:10.7227/IJMEE.39.3.1