Loading…

P-144: Comparison between clinical and echocardiographic patterns of dilated cardiomiophaty secondary to hypertension and primary dilated cardiomiophaty

The clinical and echocardiographic pattern of the dilated cardiomiopathy (DCM) secondary to hypertension is not well study. We try to compare the clinical and echocardiographic patterns of the hypertensive DCM compared with primary DCM. From a record of the 100 firstly diagnosed consecutive DCM in b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of hypertension 2004-05, Vol.17 (S1), p.85A-85A
Main Authors: Damasceno, Albertino, Aly, Cherizade, Arif, Gulnaze, Diogo, Domingos, Silva Cardoso, Jose, Polonia, Jorge
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The clinical and echocardiographic pattern of the dilated cardiomiopathy (DCM) secondary to hypertension is not well study. We try to compare the clinical and echocardiographic patterns of the hypertensive DCM compared with primary DCM. From a record of the 100 firstly diagnosed consecutive DCM in black patients during 2002 we selected patients with primary DCM and the ones secondary to hypertension (HTA). All the other forms of DCM as diabetic, chronic renal failure, frequency induced, ischemic, HIV positive and alcoholic patients were excluded. DCM was diagnosed if the left ventricle diastolic diameter (LVDD) was bigger then 117% of the expected value (Henry formula) and if ejection fraction (EF) was inferior to 40%. DCM secondary to hypertension was defined if there was a blood pressure (BP) equal or above 140/90 mm Hg or a previous history of hypertension. All patients were submitted to a clinical exam, biochemical analysis and a bidimensional guided m mode evaluation of the left ventricular measures using the ASE standards. 61 patients were selected, 31 with primary DCM (15 females) and 30 with DCM secondary to HTA (11 females). Patients with DCM secondary to HTA were older (61±16 v 53±13 years old p
ISSN:0895-7061
1941-7225
DOI:10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.03.218