Mixing Pleasure with Work: Employee Perceptions of and Responses to Workplace Romance

This study examined organizational members' perceptions of and responses to workplace romance. In this 2 × 4 experimental design, 212 working adults reported their beliefs and communication-related responses to a hypothetical male or female coworker dating an organizational peer, superior, subo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Western journal of communication 2012-07, Vol.76 (4), p.358-379
Main Authors: Malachowski, Colleen C., Chory, Rebecca M., Claus, Christopher J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Beliefs
Deception
Employees
Information Manipulation
Love
Manipulation
Motives
Peers
Perceptions
Personal relationships
Research design
Romance languages
Trust
Unfair Advantages
Workplace Romance
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study examined organizational members' perceptions of and responses to workplace romance. In this 2 × 4 experimental design, 212 working adults reported their beliefs and communication-related responses to a hypothetical male or female coworker dating an organizational peer, superior, subordinate, or individual unaffiliated with the organization. Employees perceived peers dating superiors to be more driven by job motives, less driven by love motives, and more likely to receive unfair advantages due to their romance than peers dating individuals of other status types. Employees also reported a higher likelihood of engaging in information manipulation with and reported less trust in peers dating superiors than peers with romantic partners of other status types. Finally, job and love motives, perceptions of peers enjoying unfair advantages due to their romance, and peer trust mediated the relationships between the status of the organizational peer's partner and coworkers' self-disclosure and deception with the peer.
ISSN:1057-0314
1745-1027
DOI:10.1080/10570314.2012.656215