Loading…

Efficacy and tolerability of once-monthly oral ibandronate (150 mg) and once-weekly oral alendronate (70 mg): Additional results from the monthly oral therapy with ibandronate for osteoporosis intervention (MOTION) study

Abstract Background: The MOTION (Monthly Oral Therapy with Ibandronate for Osteoporosis Intervention) study reported that once-monthly ibandronate was noninferior to once-weekly alendronate in terms of increasing bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and total hip over 12 months. On analysi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical therapeutics 2009-04, Vol.31 (4), p.751-761
Main Authors: Emkey, Ronald, MD, Delmas, Pierre D., MD, PhD, Bolognese, Michael, MS, MD, Borges, Joao Lindolfo C., MD, CCD, Cosman, Felicia, MD, Ragi-Eis, Sergio, MD, Recknor, Christopher, MD, Zerbini, Cristiano A., MD, Neate, Colin, MSc, Sedarati, Farhad, PhD, Epstein, Solomon, MD, FRCP
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background: The MOTION (Monthly Oral Therapy with Ibandronate for Osteoporosis Intervention) study reported that once-monthly ibandronate was noninferior to once-weekly alendronate in terms of increasing bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and total hip over 12 months. On analysis of secondary and exploratory end points in MOTION, which included trochanter and femoral neck BMD, monthly ibandronate was found to be noninferior to weekly alendronate. The coprimary, secondary, and exploratory BMD end points from MOTION have been previously reported. Objective: This report presents additional results from the MOTION study, including response rates in terms of lumbar spine and total hip BMD gains above baseline; findings from a comparison of serum concentrations of bone turnover markers; and tolerability analysis, including adverse events that led to withdrawal and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. Methods: MOTION was a 12-month (with 15-day follow-up), randomized, multinational, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, nonin-feriority study in postmenopausal women aged 55 to
ISSN:0149-2918
1879-114X
DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.04.018