Loading…
Prognosis of malignant sacrococcygeal germ cell tumours according to their natural history and surgical management
Abstract Introduction Malignant sacrococcygeal (SC) germ cell tumours (GCT) may be diagnosed as primary pelvic tumour or malignant recurrence of foetal SC teratoma (FSCT) operated during the neonatal period. In order to evaluate the difference between these two populations, the authors report their...
Saved in:
Published in: | Surgical oncology 2012-06, Vol.21 (2), p.e31-e37 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract Introduction Malignant sacrococcygeal (SC) germ cell tumours (GCT) may be diagnosed as primary pelvic tumour or malignant recurrence of foetal SC teratoma (FSCT) operated during the neonatal period. In order to evaluate the difference between these two populations, the authors report their experience with SC-GCT registered in the French TGM 95 protocol. Population and methods The protocol comprised risk-adapted-chemotherapy (CT) followed by surgery. Standard risk (SR: localized tumour completely resected) had no adjuvant therapy. Intermediate-Risk (IR: localized tumour, incomplete or no initial surgery with αFP 15,000 ng/ml and/or metastases) received Etoposide–Ifosfamide–Cisplatin. Results Fifty-seven patients with SC-GCT, aged 0–80 months (median 16), were registered between 1995 and 2005. Nineteen patients had secondary SC-GCT after FSCT. All patients received CT: 17 IR and 1 SR after reevolution; 39 HR (25 with metastases). 51 patients underwent delayed surgery, which was incomplete in 8 patients. Evolution Seventy-two percent of the secondary SC-GCT had systematic biological follow-up. αFP increasing was the first presenting sign in 80% of the cases. Patients with secondary SC-GCT had a lower median αFP level at diagnosis, were less frequently classified as HR and received less CT. The two groups with secondary vs. primary SC-GCT had a statistically similar favourable outcome (Overall Survival: 93.8% vs. 86.2%; Event-Free Survival: 89.2 vs. 78.2%; p > 0.34 and >0.32), respectively, but with less burden of therapy. Conclusions SC-GCT has a good overall prognosis provided complete surgery is achieved and CT is administered to IR and HR patients. SC-GCT in patients followed by αFP after treatment for FSCT had less tumour extension than newly-diagnosed patients, probably because of earlier detection of the disease. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0960-7404 1879-3320 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.suronc.2012.03.001 |