Loading…
How do European firms adjust their labour costs when nominal wages are rigid?
Although workers' nominal wages are seldom cut, firms have multiple options available if they require adjustments in their wage bills. We broaden the analysis of relative (in)flexibility in labour costs by investigating the use of other margins of labour cost adjustment at the firm level beyond...
Saved in:
Published in: | Labour economics 2012-10, Vol.19 (5), p.792-801 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Although workers' nominal wages are seldom cut, firms have multiple options available if they require adjustments in their wage bills. We broaden the analysis of relative (in)flexibility in labour costs by investigating the use of other margins of labour cost adjustment at the firm level beyond base wages. Using data from a unique survey, we find that European firms make extensive use of other components of compensation to adjust the cost of labour. Interestingly, firms facing base wage rigidity are more likely to use alternative margins of labour cost adjustment; therefore there appears to be some degree of substitutability between wage flexibility and the flexibility of other cost components. Changes in bonuses and non-pay benefits are some of the potential margins firms use to reduce costs. We also show how the margins of adjustment chosen are affected by unionisation and firm and worker characteristics.
► We investigate how firms can adjust wage bills without cutting base wages. ► The data come from a unique survey of firms across Europe. ► Firms make extensive use of other components of compensation to adjust labour costs. ► Changes in bonuses and non-pay benefits most common margins used. ► Margins affected by unionisation and firm and worker characteristics. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0927-5371 1879-1034 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.labeco.2012.03.010 |