Loading…

A Fast ULV Logic Synthesis Flow in Many-[Formula Omitted] CMOS Processes for Minimum Energy Under Timing Constraints

Ultra-low-voltage (ULV) logic offers the opportunity to operate at the minimum-energy point (MEP) for applications with low-to-medium speed requirements. Unfortunately, the critical design constraint of achieving a reliable timing closure at the target frequency of the application becomes very compl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on circuits and systems. II, Express briefs Express briefs, 2012-12, Vol.59 (12), p.947
Main Authors: Bol, David, Hocquet, CĂ©dric, Regazzoni, Francesco
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Ultra-low-voltage (ULV) logic offers the opportunity to operate at the minimum-energy point (MEP) for applications with low-to-medium speed requirements. Unfortunately, the critical design constraint of achieving a reliable timing closure at the target frequency of the application becomes very complex in the wide design space of ULV including supply [Formula Omitted] and threshold [Formula Omitted] voltage selection as well as netlist optimizations from the synthesis. In this paper, we propose a fast synthesis flow to accurately predict the [Formula Omitted] MEP under strict timing constraints. Compared to an exhaustive search for the MEP under timing constraints based on numerous library recharacterizations and synthesis steps for all [Formula Omitted] pairs, the proposed ULV flow dramatically speeds up the design process. Indeed, it requires a single library recharacterization and only three synthesis steps. Results obtained for several ITC'99 benchmarks under a wide range of timing constraints from 0.1 to 30 MHz in 65-nm LP/GP CMOS demonstrate that the proposed flow has a less than 10% energy penalty with respect to the absolute MEP computed with an exhaustive search and energy savings enhanced up to 2.4[Formula Omitted] compared to a conventional flow with [Formula Omitted] scaling only.
ISSN:1549-7747
1558-3791
DOI:10.1109/TCSII.2012.2231034