Another View of the Suspension and Expulsion Cases

This article comments on a paper by Mitchell Yell (EC 221 141) which asserts that five common law principles of suspension and expulsion retain their significance after the Supreme Court's decision in Honig v Doe. The article examines factors impacting on placement of students with disabilities...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Exceptional children 1991-02, Vol.57 (4), p.360
Main Author: Huefner, Dixie Snow
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Behavior Problems
Common Law
Court Litigation
Disabilities
Elementary Secondary Education
Exceptional children
Expulsion
Federal Legislation
Federal Regulation
Honig v Doe
Student Behavior
Student expulsion
Student Placement
Student suspension
Suspension
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article comments on a paper by Mitchell Yell (EC 221 141) which asserts that five common law principles of suspension and expulsion retain their significance after the Supreme Court's decision in Honig v Doe. The article examines factors impacting on placement of students with disabilities, including litigation; federal regulations; and constitutional, statutory, and common law. (JDD)
ISSN:0014-4029
2163-5560