Loading…
Subgame-perfection in free transition games
► Subgame-perf. ε-eq. ∀>0 in free transition games without (semi-) continuous pay-offs. ► New technique to prove the existence of these subgame-perfect ε-equilibria. ► Polynomial time algorithm for construction of these subgame-perfect ε-equilibria. We prove the existence of a subgame-perfect ε-e...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of operational research 2013-07, Vol.228 (1), p.201-207 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ► Subgame-perf. ε-eq. ∀>0 in free transition games without (semi-) continuous pay-offs. ► New technique to prove the existence of these subgame-perfect ε-equilibria. ► Polynomial time algorithm for construction of these subgame-perfect ε-equilibria.
We prove the existence of a subgame-perfect ε-equilibrium, for every ε>0, in a class of multi-player games with perfect information, which we call free transition games. The novelty is that a non-trivial class of perfect information games is solved for subgame-perfection, with multiple non-terminating actions, in which the payoff structure is generally not (upper or lower) semi-continuous. Due to the lack of semi-continuity, there is no general rule of comparison between the payoffs that a player can obtain by deviating a large but finite number of times or, respectively, infinitely many times. We introduce new techniques to overcome this difficulty.
Our construction relies on an iterative scheme which is independent of ε and terminates in polynomial time with the following output: for all possible histories h, a pure action ah1 or in some cases two pure actions ah2 and bh2 for the active player at h. The subgame-perfect ε-equilibrium then prescribes for every history h that the active player plays ah1 with probability 1 or respectively plays ah2 with probability 1−δ(ε) and bh2 with probability δ(ε). Here, δ(ε) is arbitrary as long as it is positive and small compared to ε, so the strategies can be made “almost” pure. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0377-2217 1872-6860 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.01.034 |