Loading…

The cosmic Mach number: comparison from observations, numerical simulations and non-linear predictions

We calculate the cosmic Mach number M - the ratio of the bulk flow of the velocity field on scale R to the velocity dispersion within regions of scale R. M is effectively a measure of the ratio of large-scale to small-scale power and can be a useful tool to constrain the cosmological parameter space...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2013-06, Vol.432 (1), p.307-317
Main Authors: Agarwal, Shankar, Feldman, Hume A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We calculate the cosmic Mach number M - the ratio of the bulk flow of the velocity field on scale R to the velocity dispersion within regions of scale R. M is effectively a measure of the ratio of large-scale to small-scale power and can be a useful tool to constrain the cosmological parameter space. Using a compilation of existing peculiar velocity surveys, we calculate M and compare it to that estimated from mock catalogues extracted from the Large Suite of Dark Matter Simulations (LasDamas, a Λ cold dark matter cosmology) numerical simulations. We find agreement with expectations for the LasDamas cosmology at ∼1.5σ confidence level. We also show that our Mach estimates for the mocks are not biased by selection function effects. To achieve this, we extract dense and nearly isotropic distributions using Gaussian selection functions with the same width as the characteristic depth of the real surveys, and show that the Mach numbers estimated from the mocks are very similar to the values based on Gaussian profiles of the corresponding widths. We discuss the importance of the survey window functions in estimating their effective depths. We investigate the non-linear matter power spectrum interpolator pkann as an alternative to numerical simulations, in the study of Mach number.
ISSN:0035-8711
1365-2966
DOI:10.1093/mnras/stt464