Loading…
Copper(I) Acetate-Catalyzed Cycloaddition between Azomethine Imines and Propiolates under Additive-Free Conditions
Because propiolates easily undergo base‐catalyzed self‐Michael addition, most popular catalytic systems in CuAAC cannot be used in the cycloaddition between azomethine imines and propiolates, because such reactions usually require the use of tertiary amines as additives (as base and/or ligand). We f...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of organic chemistry 2013-10, Vol.2013 (28), p.6443-6448 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Because propiolates easily undergo base‐catalyzed self‐Michael addition, most popular catalytic systems in CuAAC cannot be used in the cycloaddition between azomethine imines and propiolates, because such reactions usually require the use of tertiary amines as additives (as base and/or ligand). We found that this problem can be resolved simply by using copper(I) acetate as catalyst, in which the acetate serves as a ligand and is converted into acetic acid during the reaction. Thus, copper(I) acetate catalyzed cycloaddition actually proceeds under additive‐free conditions (without exogenous ligand) to efficiently give 6,7‐dihydropyrazolo[1,2‐a]pyrazolone derivatives, in which the side‐reactions and byproducts caused by basic additives are completely avoided.
Copper(I) acetate proved to be a highly efficient catalyst for the cycloaddition between azomethine imines and propiolates under additive‐free conditions. As a result, base‐catalyzed self‐Michael addition of propiolates (side‐reaction) and the formation of associated byproducts caused by additives (serving as either base or ligand) is completely avoided. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1434-193X 1099-0690 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ejoc.201300753 |