Loading…

A Systematic Review Comparing Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Contingency Management for Cocaine Dependence

The main objective of this review was to compare the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy and contingency management for cocaine dependence. Contingency management alone reliably reduced cocaine use during active treatment in all cited trials, whereas the positive effect of cognitive-behavi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of addictive diseases 2013-07, Vol.32 (3), p.274-287
Main Authors: Farronato, Nadine S., Dürsteler-MacFarland, Kenneth M., Wiesbeck, Gerhard A., Petitjean, Sylvie A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The main objective of this review was to compare the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy and contingency management for cocaine dependence. Contingency management alone reliably reduced cocaine use during active treatment in all cited trials, whereas the positive effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy emerged after treatment in 3 of 5 trials. Synergistic effects of the combination of contingency management plus cognitive-behavioral therapy are shown in 2 trials, but another 3 trials found no additive effects. Positive, rapid, and enduring effects on cocaine use are reliably seen with contingency management interventions, whereas measurable effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy emerge after treatment and are not as reliable as effects with contingency management.
ISSN:1055-0887
1545-0848
DOI:10.1080/10550887.2013.824328