Loading…

Quantitative Auger Electron Spectroscopic Analysis of Hg^sub 1-x^Cd^sub x^Te

Issue Title: 2013 Electronic Materials Conference. Guest Editors: Joshua Caldwell, Rachel Goldman, Oana Jurchescu, Xuiling Li, Suzanne Mohney, Jamie Phillips, Grace Xing, Jian Xu, and Joshua Zide Auger electron spectroscopy of Hg^sub 1-x^Cd^sub x^Te has been investigated for quantitative analysis. H...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of electronic materials 2014-04, Vol.43 (4), p.1255
Main Authors: Gaucher, A, Martinez, E, Baylet, J, Cardinaud, C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Issue Title: 2013 Electronic Materials Conference. Guest Editors: Joshua Caldwell, Rachel Goldman, Oana Jurchescu, Xuiling Li, Suzanne Mohney, Jamie Phillips, Grace Xing, Jian Xu, and Joshua Zide Auger electron spectroscopy of Hg^sub 1-x^Cd^sub x^Te has been investigated for quantitative analysis. HgCdTe is known to be a very sensitive material which easily suffers from ion beam and electron beam interactions. Two methods were compared for accurate and reproducible quantification of the chemical composition. The first strategy was to reduce as much as possible the damage caused by surface preparation and the effect of the incident electron beam on the material. Quantification was then achieved by use of relative sensitivity factors estimated by use of calibration reference samples. This method was rejected because of unavoidable beam damage which resulted in different chemical changes for the reference CdTe and the HgCdTe sample of interest. The second strategy was to precisely control the experimental conditions to ensure reproducible degradation. Quantification was achieved by analysis of reference HgCdTe samples with different Cd composition. Successful quantification was achieved on stoichiometric material of composition of 0.2 < X ^sub Cd^ < 0.3 with a X ^sub Cd^ discrimination limit of ΔX ^sub Cd^ = 0.02 and an analysis step of 10 nm.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:0361-5235
1543-186X
DOI:10.1007/s11664-014-3036-2