Impact of Students Pharmacists on the Medication Reconciliation Process in High-Risk Hospitalized General Medicine Patients

To compare the accuracy of medication lists obtained by student pharmacists, nurses, and physicians, and quantify the number of discrepancies identified as part of the medication reconciliation process. Between May and July 2012, patients admitted to an internal medicine team at a 350-bed tertiary a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of pharmaceutical education 2014-02, Vol.78 (2), p.1
Main Authors: Lancaster, Jason Wesley, Grgurich, Philip E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accuracy
Alcohol Abuse
Cardiovascular disease
Drug stores
Heart attacks
Hospitalization
Hospitals
Internal Medicine
Interviews
Medical records
Nurses
Patients
Pharmacists
Pharmacy
Physicians
Place of Residence
Studies
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To compare the accuracy of medication lists obtained by student pharmacists, nurses, and physicians, and quantify the number of discrepancies identified as part of the medication reconciliation process. Between May and July 2012, patients admitted to an internal medicine team at a 350-bed tertiary academic medical center were assessed for inclusion in the study. Physicians and/or nurses conducted medication reviews for these patients at the time of admission, while student pharmacists conducted medication reconciliation. Eighty-six patients were assessed, and 52 met all inclusion criteria. A total of 268 discrepancies were identified as part of the medication reconciliation performed by the student pharmacists, approximating 5 discrepancies per patient (range 0-13). Student pharmacists identified 532 preadmission medications, significantly more than did nurses (355) or physicians (368), p=0.006. Student pharmacists, with appropriate oversight, can be used in several tasks that previously may have been designated to pharmacists only, such as medication reconciliation.
ISSN:0002-9459
1553-6467