Loading…

Nilotinib population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analysis in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia

Purpose We evaluated the population pharmacokinetics (PK) and exposure-response relationship of nilotinib in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Methods Concentration data from 493 patients with CML in chronic phase (CML-CP), accelerated phase, or blast cr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of clinical pharmacology 2013-04, Vol.69 (4), p.813-823
Main Authors: Giles, Francis J., Yin, Ophelia Q. P., Sallas, William M., le Coutre, Philipp D., Woodman, Richard C., Ottmann, Oliver G., Baccarani, Michele, Kantarjian, Hagop M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose We evaluated the population pharmacokinetics (PK) and exposure-response relationship of nilotinib in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Methods Concentration data from 493 patients with CML in chronic phase (CML-CP), accelerated phase, or blast crisis were used to perform a population pharmacokinetic analysis using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. Steady-state nilotinib trough concentrations (C min ) in individual patients were estimated from the population PK model for correlation with the efficacy and safety variables. Exposure-efficacy analysis was performed in patients with CML-CP, whereas exposure-safety analysis was performed in all patients who had both nilotinib PK data and efficacy/safety measures available. Results Baseline demographics and CML disease phase did not significantly affect nilotinib PK. Patients with a lower C min had significantly longer time to complete cytogenetic response ( P  = 0.010), longer time to major molecular response ( P  = 0.012), shorter time to progression (TTP; P  = 0.009), and a trend toward lower response rates vs. patients with higher C min . A joint effect of prognostic risk score and C min on TTP was significant ( P  
ISSN:0031-6970
1432-1041
DOI:10.1007/s00228-012-1385-4