Loading…
Long-term experience with reduced planning target volume margins and intensity-modulated radiotherapy with daily image-guidance for head and neck cancer
Background The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes among patients treated by intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with daily image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for head and neck cancer according to the margins used to expand the clinical target volume (CTV) to create a planning target vol...
Saved in:
Published in: | Head & neck 2014-12, Vol.36 (12), p.1766-1772 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes among patients treated by intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with daily image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for head and neck cancer according to the margins used to expand the clinical target volume (CTV) to create a planning target volume (PTV).
Methods
Three hundred sixty‐seven consecutive patients were treated with IMRT for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The first 103 patients were treated with 5‐mm CTV‐to‐PTV margins. The subsequent 264 patients were treated using reduced (3 mm) margins.
Results
The 3‐year locoregional control for patients treated using 5‐mm and 3‐mm CTV‐to‐PTV margins, respectively, was 78% and 80% (p = .75). The incidence of gastrostomy‐tube dependence at 1 year was 10% and 3%, respectively (p = .001). The incidence of posttreatment esophageal stricture was 14% and 7%, respectively (p = .01).
Conclusion
The use of reduced (3 mm) CTV‐to‐PTV margins was associated with reduced late toxicity while maintaining locoregional control. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 36: 1766–1772, 2014 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1043-3074 1097-0347 |
DOI: | 10.1002/hed.23532 |