Positionality Switch: Remapping Resource Communities in Russian Borderlands

• Published in: Economic geography 2015-01, Vol.91 (1), p.59-82
• Main Authors: Kortelainen, Jarmo, Rannikko, Pertti
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Borders; Boundaries; Community; Contextual analysis; Economic geography; Economic models; Economic theory; Economics; Environmentalism; Forest products industry; Forestry; forestry communities; Geographers; Geography; Heterogeneity; Industrialism; International trade; Local communities; local models; Positionality; postsocialism; resource peripheries; Resource utilization; Russia; Russian Federation; Russians; Studies; Tariffs; Technology; Timber; Transportation; Wood production; Work organization
• ISSN: 0013-0095; 1944-8287
• DOI: 10.1111/ecge.12064

This article elaborates on the contested periphery approach and related local models. Some economic geographers argue that the peculiarities of resource peripheries cannot be understood with the help of economic theories designed in economic cores. The contested periphery approach was developed specifically for resource economies and stresses the importance of geographically variable interactions of stakeholder groups that channel broad institutional values (industrialism, regulationism, environmentalism, and aboriginalism) into peripheries. Along with local features, they create local models, and changes in relations occasionally remap the conditions for resource utilization. The contested periphery approach is based on comparisons between large territorial regions, but we argue that this does not provide sufficient tools to recognize the relationally formed heterogeneity of peripheries. Instead, this article focuses on the changing positionalities of local communities. We introduce the concept of positionality switch to highlight the ways abrupt shifts in the direction of relations alter local positionalities. Empirically, we explore two Russian forestry communities in the Finnish-Russian borderland. Cross-border trade connections and the shifting semipermeability of the boundary have greatly influenced the local model and remapped borderland communities. Reestablished timber export in the 1990s began to create a local model shaped by imported forestry technologies and work organization systems. In the 2000s, higher customs duties for wood and deteriorating transportation links cut off both the cross-border and domestic connections leaving the settlements in limbo. The article concludes by arguing that the contested periphery approach and local models should be localized and supplemented with the concepts of positionality and positionality switch as well as contextually relevant concepts because they help to better understand the particularities and specific relations of each local model.