Moral motivation in defending classmates victimized by bullying

The study addresses factors that relate to defending of classmates victimized by bullying in early adolescence. Specifically, it examines whether moral motivation-measured as a combination of emotion attributions and their justifications in response to a hypothetical transgression-predicts defending...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of developmental psychology 2015-05, Vol.12 (3), p.297-309
Main Authors: Kollerová, Lenka, Janošová, Pavlína, ŘíČan, Pavel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescence
Bullying
Defending
Elementary school students
Moral motivation
Morality
Peer relations
Peer relationships
Prosocial behaviour
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The study addresses factors that relate to defending of classmates victimized by bullying in early adolescence. Specifically, it examines whether moral motivation-measured as a combination of emotion attributions and their justifications in response to a hypothetical transgression-predicts defending in context of gender, social preference, perceived popularity and teacher support. We gathered single-time-point data on a sample of 512 sixth-graders (aged 11-13 years). A three-step hierarchical regression analysis showed that defending was positively predicted by: (1) moral motivation, when gender, social preference, perceived popularity and teacher support were accounted for; (2) interaction between moral motivation and social preference, when all other independent variables were accounted for. Simple slopes indicated that increased social preference strengthened the link between moral motivation and defending. The full model explained 40.5% of the variance in defending. The findings underscore the relevance of morality and its interplay with social preference in understanding defending.
ISSN:1740-5629
1740-5610
DOI:10.1080/17405629.2015.1006125