sup 99m^Tc-3PRGD^sub 2^ SPECT/CT predicts the outcome of advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy plus bevacizumab

• Published in: Annals of nuclear medicine 2015-07, Vol.29 (6), p.519
• Main Authors: Ma, Qingjie, Min, Kaiyin, Wang, Ting, Chen, Bin, Wen, Qiang, Wang, Fan, Ji, Tiefeng, Gao, Shi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0914-7187; 1864-6433
• DOI: 10.1007/s12149-015-0975-5

Functional imaging can help clinicians assess the individual response of advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to chemoradiation therapy plus bevacizumab. Our purpose is to investigate the ability of ^sup 99m^Tc-3PRGD^sub 2^ single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in predicting the early response to treatment. Patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC diagnosed by histological or cytological examination were imaged with ^sup 99m^Tc-3PRGD^sub 2^ SPECT/CT at 3 time points: 1-3 days before the start of treatment (SPECT1), 40 Gy radiotherapy with 2 cycles of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (SPECT2) and 4 weeks after chemoradiotherapy plus bevacizumab (SPECT3). The images were evaluated semiquantitatively by measuring the tumor to non-tumor ratio (T/N) and calculating the percentage change in T/N ratio. Short-term outcome was assessed by the treatment response evaluation according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria as: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD). Patients were divided two groups: responders (CR and PR) and nonresponders (SD and PD). To determine a threshold for percent reduction in T/N ratios, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used. Patients were grouped again based on the threshold of P1 (the change percentage from SPECT1 to SPECT2) and P2 (the change percentage from SPECT1 to SPECT3): P1 responders and P1 nonresponders; P2 responders and P2 nonresponders. Patients were followed up starting 4 weeks after completion of therapy and then every 3 months for the first 2 years and every 6 months after 2 years. OS of P1 responders, P1 nonresponders, P2 responders and P2 nonresponders was estimated and graphically illustrated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used to test the null hypotheses of equal OS in subgroups of patients. A total of 28 patients completed all imaging and treatment. All primary lung tumors were well visualized on SPECT1. The mean T/N ratio of SPECT1 in responders and nonresponders was not statistically different (2.73 ± 0.59 vs. 2.59 ± 0.52, p > 0.05). At SPECT2 and SPECT3, the mean T/N ratios were both lower in the responders compared with the nonresponders and had statistical significance (p < 0.05). P1 and P2 in the responders was larger than the nonresponders with significant difference (P1: 34.18 ± 21.55 % vs. 9.02 ± 14.02 %, p < 0.05; P2: 53.02 ± 15.50