Chemical Use and Forest Certification: Productivity and Economic Implications

Forest certification programs provide standards for multiple aspects of forest management, including the use of chemicals for mitigating competition and forest pests. The three most common programs in the United States-the American Tree Farm System, the Forest Stewardship Council, and the Sustainabl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of forestry 2015-07, Vol.113 (4), p.367-371
Main Authors: Mendell, Brooks C., Lang, Amanda H., Caldwell, Will, Garrett, David L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bans
Certification
Chemicals
Discounted cash flow
Environmental protection
Financial analysis
Forest management
Herbicides
Plantations
Productivity
Vegetation
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Forest certification programs provide standards for multiple aspects of forest management, including the use of chemicals for mitigating competition and forest pests. The three most common programs in the United States-the American Tree Farm System, the Forest Stewardship Council, and the Sustainable Forestry Initiative-all address chemical use. To evaluate relative impacts under different certification schemes, this research estimates productivity and economic implications of a scenario resembling management on nonindustrial private forestland. The research compares estimates from a mechanical-only treatment and two levels of chemical treatments. Results indicate that strict chemical use restrictions lead to lower levels of forest productivity and reduce potential financial returns. The mechanical scenario generated 6% less volume than the baseline scenario, and the more chemically intensive scenario generated 12% more volume than the baseline. The estimated net present value of the mechanical scenario (no chemical use) was 12% less than the baseline.
ISSN:0022-1201
1938-3746
DOI:10.5849/jof.14-121