Loading…

The Informedness Effect and Volume of Trade

Theoretical models of trade show that information-based trading is a consequence of four fundamental determinants: heterogeneous prior beliefs, differential interpretations, the consensus effect, and the informedness effect. Although the effects of these determinants on trading volume are clear theo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of accounting, auditing & finance auditing & finance, 2015-10, Vol.30 (4), p.407-430
Main Authors: Atiase, Rowland K., Gift, Michael J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Theoretical models of trade show that information-based trading is a consequence of four fundamental determinants: heterogeneous prior beliefs, differential interpretations, the consensus effect, and the informedness effect. Although the effects of these determinants on trading volume are clear theoretically, there is no prior empirical evidence on the relation between the informedness effect and the volume of trade, nor is there any empirical evidence on the incremental effect of each of the four determinants on the volume of trade. This study provides empirical evidence to fill this void. Consistent with theoretical predictions in Holthausen and Verrecchia, we find a significantly positive relation between the informedness effect and trading volume reactions to quarterly earnings announcements. We also find that the proxies for each of the four fundamental determinants of trading volume—prior belief heterogeneity, differential interpretation, the consensus effect, and the informedness effect of quarterly earnings signals—play a significant incremental role in explaining trading volume, thereby corroborating the theoretical results of financial economists. An important implication of our results is that empirical models of trade should consider controlling for each of these determinants.
ISSN:0148-558X
2160-4061
DOI:10.1177/0148558X15571735