Forage yield and chemical composition of canola (Brassica napus L.) as affected by sowing methods

• Published in: Grass and forage science 2016-06, Vol.71 (2), p.281-290
• Main Authors: Reta‐Sánchez, D. G, J. S. Serrato‐Corona, H. M. Quiroga‐Garza, A. Gaytán‐Mascorro, U. Figueroa‐Viramontes
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Brassica napus; canola; crude protein; dry-matter yield; energy; field experimentation; forage; forage rape; forage yield; growing season; lactation; nutrients yield; row spacing; sowing; temperature
• ISSN: 0142-5242; 1365-2494
• DOI: 10.1111/gfs.12174

The sowing method of spring‐type canola (Brassica napus L. var. oleifera) for forage has a major influence on its productivity and agronomic management. A field experiment was conducted in Matamoros, Coahuila, Mexico, during two growing seasons (2008–2009 and 2009–2010) to determine dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) and net energy for lactation (NEL) yields, as well as canola forage chemical composition as a function of six sowing methods. The treatments assessed were broadcast sowing and five different row spacings: 0·19, 0·38, 0·57, 0·76 and 0·95 m (double row, 0·20 m apart). In the first year, with a mean growing season temperature of 17·2°C, sowing methods did not affect DM yield, but CP and NEL content and yield were higher in 0·19‐m row spacing. The mean temperature in the second year (13·5°C) was slightly lower than the long‐term mean (14·8°C) in the region, resulting in the highest DM (8840 kg ha⁻¹), CP (2486 kg ha⁻¹) and NEL yields (51 103 MJ ha⁻¹) with 0·19‐m row spacing. In row‐sowing methods with over 0·19‐m row spacing, DM, CP and NEL yields decreased by 19·3–39·7, 20·4–42·1 and 21·2–42·7% respectively. Results indicate that sowing methods significantly affected canola forage productivity.